Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Nov 22, 2019 05:58

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Have they gone?
PostPosted: Thu Mar 10, 2005 23:48 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Have they gone?

There's been no post from the JJ account since Monday...

Was the Radio Cumbria debate challenge too much for them?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 00:01 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
Been no sign of him/them all week - in any previous guise (or as guests so far as I can tell).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 01:36 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
Well talivanis scamerati is a very shy and retiring creature by nature you know.

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 03:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2004 00:14
Posts: 535
Location: Victoria, Australia
And with any luck they might become extinct. :D

_________________
Ross

Yes I'm a hoon, but only on the track!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
It certainly does look as though they are sulking.
Maybe when faced with irrefutable logic and a question they can't answer honestly and to their advantage they just go away and hide in their silly vans.

They have two probles of our making:
1. The 'Control Site' question
2. The 5% Causation question

It certainly looks as though they don't want to get into honest discussion about the control sites and can't refute the logic that if you address a certain percentage of a problem, that's the only percentage you can reduce.

Gone for good? Who knows.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:26 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 15:38
Posts: 413
Cooperman wrote:
It certainly does look as though they are sulking.
Maybe when faced with irrefutable logic and a question they can't answer honestly and to their advantage they just go away and hide in their silly vans.

They have two probles of our making:
1. The 'Control Site' question
2. The 5% Causation question

It certainly looks as though they don't want to get into honest discussion about the control sites and can't refute the logic that if you address a certain percentage of a problem, that's the only percentage you can reduce.

Gone for good? Who knows.


:wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 11:31 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
JJ wrote:
:wink:


Oh good, I'm glad you're still here.

What's happening with the Radio Cumbria debate challenge?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 16:13 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 21:42
Posts: 186
Location: Notts.
JJ wrote:
:wink:



Well, the 'one liners' don't come much shorter than that. :lol:


SafeSpeed wrote:
JJ wrote:
:wink:


Oh good, I'm glad you're still here.

What's happening with the Radio Cumbria debate challenge?


The reply will probably be:

:?:
0r:
:oops:




:lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"CAMERAS "DO NOT" SAVE LIVES" !!
(Richard Brunstrom Says so !!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 16:16 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Hanbo... wrote:
JJ wrote:
:wink:



Well, the 'one liners' don't come much shorter than that. :lol:


SafeSpeed wrote:
JJ wrote:
:wink:


Oh good, I'm glad you're still here.

What's happening with the Radio Cumbria debate challenge?


The reply will probably be:

:?:
0r:
:oops:




:lol: :lol: :lol:


:idea:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 16:18 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
:roll:

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 11, 2005 16:19 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
Image

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 14:32 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2004 21:42
Posts: 186
Location: Notts.
The news that Brunstrom has finally admitted that their scams are "Not Saving Lives" is too much for them to bear ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

They'll be looking for new jobs now ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

I hear that 'McDonalds' are taking on additional staff ! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Mind you, CSCP 'ex scammers' are too dumb to get a job at 'McDonalds' !! :lol: :lol: :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

Image
The drinks are on me !! :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
"CAMERAS "DO NOT" SAVE LIVES" !!
(Richard Brunstrom Says so !!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 14:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
Ya know, theyre charged with "saving lives" as their job, but they fail.
They fail to answer questions that have answers they dont like and if they were to answer would expose them for the charlatans they are, liars in fact, but thats not nearly a strong enough descriptor for them.
They faff around in "high vis" vans hidden behind signs and trees and steal from people, hiding behind a false banner of "road safety" while they rob you.
They falsify stats to support their pathetic existence.

And while they muck around, lying and stealing, people are dying on our roads at a higher rate than when these slime started their activities.

Ya know what? They should be charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence, incompitence and stupidity.

My opinion of them grows less every day theyre in operation. Theyre parasites and from now on ill not even bother myself with them, theyre the lowest form of amoebal life on a slime ridden world in Alpha Centauri.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 15:12 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
DeltaF wrote:
Ya know what? They should be charged with manslaughter and criminal negligence, incompitence and stupidity.

My opinion of them grows less every day theyre in operation. Theyre parasites and from now on ill not even bother myself with them, theyre the lowest form of amoebal life on a slime ridden world in Alpha Centauri.


Don't hold back... tell us what you REALLY think! :lol:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 15:22 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
After another hour I'll not be posting for a while - at least nopthing of any particular sense. Why? I have a bottle of '89 Mumms in the freezer. This will be only the third bottle I have ever opened in my life. No 1 was to celebrate the leaving of a personnel director some long long time ago from my firm, no 2 was to celepbrate the birth of a close friend's son - and no 3 to celebrate what I tuly see as the beginning of the end of the camera era. the tide truly is now on the turn. It has to be. but what a long hard slog it's been. CHEERS.

and... the first toast will be to Paul for his tireless work in bringing the calamity into the public domain in a way I truly do not believe could have been done better by anyone I know, even with 20/20 hind sight. A tremendous achievement.

In many ways, his work is still in its infancy - it expands and poses more questions each time it answers one. However, the camera era is now to wane.

Time to upddate the 15-day countdown clock to... about 9? :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 13, 2005 17:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 15:52
Posts: 461
Ive only just seen Pauls press release and im staggered, i truly am!

It looks like the man who wouldnt listen has actually had what alcoholics call " a moment of clarity" and i am amazed he's said what he has.

I have to disagree with calling for his resignation though, as if he really has seen the light, he can do more good if hes where he is, and undo the damage he helped to inflict.

As for cscp and all the rest of those parasite partners, theyre finished, blown out of the water by a timebomb of their own construction.
RIP the scammers (and i dont mean peace).

Congratulations Paul on your tireless efforts in exposing their lies and the real truth, its just a pity so many extra deaths had to occur while theyve played at being god and failed i might add.

This isnt the end of the fight, its the beginning, the real work is yet to be done; reducing deaths via sensible, fair and EFFECTIVE methods that dont arbitrarily penalise drivers just because of what the sign says.

Tonight i will mostly be drinking, but never driving.
Stay safe out there and congrats to all who have contributed....its a great day!


Ps, Is that what you meant by saying what i REALLY meant Paul? :D

have a good one! :thumbsUP:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 16:55 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
So now that Herr Brainstorm has announced in an unequivocal manner that SPEED CAMERAS DO NOT SAVE LIVES can we take it that the CSCP will be reviewing it's very existance and that resignations from those who have previously been adamant that they were doing some good wil be forthcoming.
If not, why no?
If even Brunstrom can see this in a logical manner, even though it's taken him a long time to get there, can you guys still not see the absolute logic at work?
What's more important to you, to continue to collect your salaries for the now-proven 'non-job' you currently do, or to show some personal integrity and resign?
We shall see!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 17:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 18:58
Posts: 306
Location: LanCA$Hire ex Kendal
Sadly CSCP still appears to be in business - 2 more fixed digital scams have just been installed in Barrow.

A double fatal crash yesterday, another "serious" today... - neither of which CSCP could have prevented, you'll understand... :evil:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 18:17 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
How long before those fixed scameras get burned down?
There are so many that have been destroyed across the country now and it does seem to be on the increase.
If you get them early enough in their lives then they generate a capital loss on the scamera pratnership's books before they generate any revenue.
Not that I advocate this, you understand, just that destruction of cameras seems to be on the increase nationally. Not surprising really, when one considers how useless and spiteful they are.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 14, 2005 18:55 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4813
Location: Essex
I wouldn't advocate it either, but it is likely in line with future policing policies ;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 1.603s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]