Mole wrote:
Interesting list of "public" announcements there GS! Of course, if a car manufacturer has a vehicle safety defect, there is a well-established method for contacting the affected vehicle keepers and leaving them in NO DOUBT of the message you're trying to put across. It ain't cheap, but what price safety eh? Just think, you could reach every driving licence holder in the country so easily...
...if you wanted to!
in fact, if cost IS an issue (though I'm lead to believe it's not about the money!) you could even wait until tax reminders got sent out - at least that way you'd be able to reach every registered keeper in the country, at least once a year, for little more than the cost of the flyers!
I think you may be taking this a bit too far.
There is no obligation on the supplier of SPECS3 to educate or inform the public how they work or what capabilities they have. It is a speed enforcement system that will detect and has the potential to be used as evidence in excess speed situations. Enter the first location and carry on at a lawful speed until you exit the very last part and you will be just fine; no need to know anything more.
What possible reason would you have to want or need to know their tactical capabilities? There is none, hence no obligation to inform.
If you want to know it isn't difficult to find out.
Sorry mate - I was only trying to help! I know that plenty of SCP people have frequently stated that the sooner their cameras make no money, the happier they'll be - so I was just trying to spread a little happiness! Educating more people about how they work and what they do should go a long way to acheiving that!
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
Members
