Thanks for posting this, and thanks for joining up. A couple of points especially caught my eye.
Rigpig wrote:
I still believe that motorists should try to obey the speed limit, the law is still the law after all. The fact that it may be safe to exceed the limit is irrelevant, that is a good argument for having the law changed, it is not (IMHO) a good argument for breaking it.
Yep. I'd agree with that, but, and it's a huge but, irrespective of what people 'ought' to do, the vast majority of us exceed the speed limit. We could moan about why folk don't do 'the right thing' but I believe it's far more important to consider how to get them doing the
best thing not the
right thing. And of course then we also need to discuss what the 'right' things and the 'best' things are.
If we're going to make things better we have to work with the behaviours that we've actually got rather than the behaviours we think we ought to have.
Rigpig wrote:
On the same lines therefore, I don’t agree with the concept of blaming the speed cameras for peoples actions, be it braking in their vicinity or accelerating to high speed having passed one. If we are supposed to be responsible people then we take responsibility for our own actions, lashing out blame in other directions says (to me) more about the feebleness of our society that it does about the laws (crap though they may be) that supposedly incite this behavior.
We agree this point, but there's also a higher perspective. We talking about it in another thread recently:
here.
Anyway, thanks for listening, considering, developing your own thinking, and finally giving support to my work. Who could ask for anything more?