Mole wrote:
NOTE!!!!! I think that both myself AND Tone would happily agree that NEITHER of us speaks for the campaign. Certainly My views are not necessarily those of the SafeSpeed organisation etc etc yadda yadda!!
Absolutely, that’s why I included a little something in my sig. I don’t pretend to know everything on road matters, I am not that arrogant, and I like to keep an open mind. What's that expression something like 'when the facts change, I change my mind'. I
am open to research, as I've said a million times.

I just don't think you can wait and wait and wait, when you can see what's happening around you. IMO the Gov on this one would have been damned for doing this and damned for doing nothing - and also damned for taking so long to get research and data before a law was introduced or changed. It's very easy to condemn when you're not doing the job and making the policies.
In the time I’ve been here I have learnt so much and continue to. I don’t know what inroads, (no pun intended), are or have been made but one thing is for sure – if we are informed and educated
that is most certainly the best way forward to make government sit up and notice that what they are doing or have done is wrong. And to that end I take my hat off to SS

Mole wrote:
Oh no ya don't!!!
"I had to exceed the speed limit, officer, because I was overtaking"...
...since when did that work as a defence?! (especially against a scamera)? Now the VERY IMPORTANT thing to understand here, is that I AGREE with you - overtaking should be decisive and you should spend as little time on the wrong side of the road as possible, and I am absolutely NOT against exceeding the speed limit if that is the safest way to complete the manoeuvre. There was a time when that would be recognised by the authorities too - but thats not (alas!) the motoring world in which we live today. HOWEVER, getting back to this argument, the official line would simply be that if you have to exceed the speed limit, you shouldn't attempt the overtaking manoeuvre in the first place. I don't agree with that, you don't agree with that, but this is the absolute world of "exceeding the speed limit = dangerous" and "using a hand held mobile = dangerous".
&
Mole wrote:
Understood. And I DO think there are SOME differences between the two actions. However, this cuts both ways doesn't it? The approach I'm arguing for would add consistency to the campaign's stance on speeding, whereas the approach you're advocating does not!
Not at all. I think my approach is consistent because we are talking about safe verses unsafe actions. The difference I keep making is that it is entirely unnecessary and an unacceptable distraction. You may say that’s just my opinion, I accept that but to rake up every argument related to speeding here would water down the argument specifically related to HH mob use which I am trying to get across. There are similarities, yes, but the devil is in the HH detail. Can it ever be safe to speed? Yes. Can it ever be safe to use a HH mob? I’m saying no because it’s an unnecessary distraction and if you have your arm up, unless your Mole

you are restricting the important peripheral vision as in my earlier example of driving next to a clueless driver where I could have been waving my peepee at him. You are also not in full control of the car, I have a true story at the end of this. I didn't mention it on SS at the time because I felt like a fool and wasn't sure what lessons would be learnt. I think I know now...
Therefore, I say again does SS countenance creating blind spots or restricting your vision? If a small air freshener or cuddly dice, or whatever it be, is bad then so must holding your arm up. Do it again Mole, this time how normal people hold a mobile when you see them driving
They can’t have it both ways.
Long posts are wearing so although there was more I’ll leave this as my thought for the day because I'm going around in circles and getting a bit dizzy.
The nearest I’ve come to an accident in recent times, which would have been my fault, was only about two years ago in the summer. It was when a stupid squirrel decided to commit suicide and thought the best way was to jump under the wheels of my 1.4 Polo. I swerved to miss him but overcooked it, nearly going into the hedge with hard braking and wild steering. Why? Because I only had one hand on the steering wheel! It was a hot day and he jumped out as I was opening the manually adjusted sun roof – big mistake!
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind I would have been in much greater control if I’d had both hands on the wheel. But I guess someone now is going to tell me we don’t know that, I can’t possibly know that and we need research.

There is also no doubt in my mind that it wouldn’t have been so different if it was a mobile in my hand instead, also up by my head. How could having my hand on a mobile or sunroof handle be better than on the steering wheel? Answer = It can’t!!! Maybe some think it’s better because it hones your skills to dextrously place the mob on the dash or passenger seat before placing your hand where it’s most useful? Maybe some think it’s a useful to perform a drop-test of your mob occasionally? Perhaps the delay in getting your hand on the wheel is a good idea and I haven’t the faintest idea what I’m talking about after 30+ years of driving and riding in all weathers on different continents so I should just shut up?
I will, for now
