I actually attribute it more to the price of fuel than anything else Peter.
I know I can’t prove it, but in my case I would normally average 10K a year on my motorbike, however, it will easily be close on half that this year for mainly essential journeys and few pleasure ones. So in simple terms, if I do half as many miles I must be halving the likelihood of being involved in an accident?
In fact I’m not sure it isn’t far better than that because, without trying to work it out, if we
all do half as many miles then isn’t the KSI rate going to decrease exponentially to
more than by half? Who’s got a degree in maths here? I never quite had the interest in 'statistics and probability' as I didn’t see it as real maths; just a political tool to dupe everyone. I'll find the area under that curve using Calculus but just as the Lottery boasts "It could be you" what it
actually means is don't hold your breath mate. Lucky dip my a$$, in America they call it "Quick pick". It's honest! And people in this country criticise
them for the way they simplify things. I'd rather have that than our Bull$h1te. Hec you're right Mole, I
am ranting a lot lately. Are they putting something in the water around here?
So then, it would appear the best way to improve KSI is to effectively prevent us from driving by pricing us off the roads or banning us under ‘totting-up’ for doing what is, in the vast majority of cases, a victimless crime. It also ticks the ‘green’ box too, so they can add that to bolster their image. I haven’t polluted the air and risked an accident with a car of my own for about a year now because I had to sell it; I couldn't afford to run it anymore!
I don’t want to give them ideas, but then I’m sure they know anyway.