Outcast wrote:
Not here they wont, because
A: To prove a point
b: WooHoo Whiplash claim time (YOUR fault) <--- We got that idea from the yanks !!
Yup you are probably spot on there!!
Proving the point seems to be a major pastime these days (maybe it always has been?). In the last couple of weeks I've seen 2 really heartstopping sphincter clenching you are f***ing crazy overtakes, a couple of inadvisable overtakes, and 1, you might well not have made that if I hadn't slowed down quite a lot, overtake (came round corner to find car doing multi car overtake coming in opposite direction). I don't recall seeing a single brake light among the vehicles being overtaken and I'm pretty sure the one where the car was coming at me, none of the overtaken vehicles slowed much if at all, and I'm certain nobody made a gap to allow the overtake to be easily aborted.
Seems that there are folks out there who would rather be involved in a potentially lethal ovetaking accident (to prove a point??), than take any action to make the situation safer.
Reminds me of a ditty I leaned way back ...
Here lies the body of Albert J
He died maintaining his right of way
He was right so right as he drove along
But he's just as dead as if he'd been wrong
Or as my HGV instructor said ... to avoid A&E practice O&A ..... To avoid Accident & Emergency practice Obsevation & Action. If you observe something potentialy going pear shaped YOU yes YOU take action to do something about it no matter who you think is a fault.
Oh but hold on .... no compensation claims if folks did that!!!
Is that topic drift or has it run over the rapids and is now 5 miles downstream

??
