Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Nov 18, 2025 21:00

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 12:46 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
Anybody else see this programme?

An hour long but very watchable, the characters were excellent and the editing will be annoying to those involved but hilarious!

- woman mini driver saying that roadside shrines were a good idea because it makes people think about their actions - then cut to her eating a sandwich with *both hands* off the wheel and commenting that egg and cress was a bad idea.

- woman in MPV saying that all her driving is about keeping her children safe - no cuts required here - she continues talking with alternating conversational type hand-gestures, sometimes with both hands off the wheel.

- road safety campaigner making stickers for people who drive safely (ie. don't exceed the speed limit). The sticker is like SS's but with a speed camera logo and tiny text around the outside (you would need to be within a metre of the bumper to read it).

The person one was hilarious. It showed her taking her daughter for a "driving lesson". The rear window of the car had two L-plates and two of her stickers, an interesting arrangement.

Daughter approaches parked car, oncoming car and very little room. Daughter doesn't slow - mother doesn't do much, then shrieks, daughter goes for gap and must have made it with inches to spare. Laughter all round!

Mother (the road safety campaigner, remember) says "ok, let's go for fourth gear - press the clutch". Daughter presses clutch and mother actually changes the lever, with lots of grinding.

Next the daughter turns off roundabout (I think) and there is a zebra crossing with pedestrian 1/4 way across. Mother says "oh, you need to stop for this" with daughter barelling towards it at 20+ mph, missed the pedestrian with very little room to spare. Red faces with laughter all round there! (no, I am serious, she was embarassed/shocked but didn't seem to realise how serious it could have ended up)

Earlier we saw her driving around and she was cut up by another driver and screeched to a halt, hitting the kerb. There wasn't enough to know precisely what happened, but perhaps it was preventable by somebody who was a better driver?

NB: The website of the woman selling stickers is www.sticktothelimit.com - It has rather a neutral point of view, but the programme painter her as pro-camera.

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 13:11 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
Yeah, I saw some of it.

I was impressed at the bloke with the specs and tash in the burgendy rover - notice PROPER observation all round? :thumbsup:

BUT as for the old geezer in the J reg Cavelear - what was he on? He shouldn't have even been on the road.

Didn't see the learner with "responsible" instructor though - perhapse as well as I would have been screaming at the TV :lol:

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 16:41 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
I managed to keep it together for about 5 minutes before I had to turn it off or scream obscenites at the screen. :o The standard of driving on what little I saw of it was shocking, particularly the MPV woman doing her driving seat disco. :furious:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 17:14 
Offline
User

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 17:04
Posts: 18
g_attrill wrote:
NB: The website of the woman selling stickers is www.sticktothelimit.com - It has rather a neutral point of view, but the programme painter her as pro-camera.


Have a look at some of the quotes that have been submitted to that website. (My emphasis in bold)


Mrs S: "I was just over the limit when I got my points and am now paranoid about going over 30, so I'm always getting honked at and flashed. This sticker might help."

Mr Sykes: "Now I can replace the notice which says 'Going slowly? This car has penalty points."

Mrs Simnett: "What a great idea. I have points on my licence and won't be hurried."

G. Holloway: "Brilliant idea. Myself and several friends have felt under pressure to increase our speed but won't."

Mr Hodder: "Congratulations, I've several friends who have all been tailgated. Well done."

C and M Burrow: "What an excellent idea, we have a name for tailgaters - haemorrhoids - a pain in the backside."

Mrs W. "I have six points on my licence, it certainly makes driving more tense. Good luck with your venture."



P.S. Hi Paul and everyone else at Safe Speed. I have been lurking on here ever since the forum started and have decided that its time to start making a contribution to the discussions.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 18:12 
Offline
Police Officer
Police Officer

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 20:50
Posts: 88
Location: South West
The programme showed just about exactly what I thought it would - the scaffolder should be off the road for good, I lost count of the number of offences he clocked up, for example...
Driving whilst using mobile phone (handheld)
Unrestrained children in 7.5tonne GV
Young girl sitting in back of an astra van (no seats)
Wife driving whilst on phone (handheld)

Frightening....

Interesting thing from Melanie Greenwood's website -

Quote:
This is a great idea for people who are happy to drive at the legal speed limits

So if they all drive at the limits and are so good, where did half the posters' points come from ???

I usually find the people most worried about tailgaters are often those driving significantly under the appropriate speed for the conditions...

And as for her teaching others to drive....learning COAST herself might help. Think I'll drop her a line and offer her a passenger ride...she's on my patch....

Paul - have you thought of getting in touch with Melanie? I assume she wasn't at your recent Bristol meeting - something tells me she's not an Advanced Motorist :(

Anyway, good to see Steve "Get Me On the Telly" Scothern doing his bit again (SY copper, now on the telly more than the testcard :lol: - nice comment about not nicking at 83mph but definately over 90....

Hang on a mo though...just found this on the limits website :

Quote:
Drivers greatly underestimate the chances of dying on the roads. It is thought that 1 in 200 people will die on the roads.


Uh ? Even if we take 4000 deaths per year, that's 800,000 deaths per annum in the UK - with a population approaching 60 million, that sounds a bit low to me....Paul ???

_________________
Never point a speedmeter at a civil or military aircraft, vessel or armoured vehicle. Many military aircraft, vehicles or vessels have target acquisition detectors, some of which initiate automatic counter measures.
Association of Chief Police Officers


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 18:29 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
cotswold wrote:
Quote:
Drivers greatly underestimate the chances of dying on the roads. It is thought that 1 in 200 people will die on the roads.

Uh ? Even if we take 4000 deaths per year, that's 800,000 deaths per annum in the UK - with a population approaching 60 million, that sounds a bit low to me....Paul ???

Yes, if there are 60 million people in the UK, and average life expectancy is 75 years, we would expect 800,000 deaths a year.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 19:16 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
edit: removed stupid calculation - replied before eating!


Last edited by g_attrill on Mon Jul 04, 2005 22:42, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 19:22 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
1 in 200 chance of dying in a road accident sounds like good odds to me.

They recon about one in three from heart disease and about the same from smoking.

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 19:25 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
Figures from the CIA World Factbook give an estimated 615,000 deaths/year in the UK. Using the 1 in 200 figure mentioned by cotswold would then give a little over 3000 road-related deaths per year - a pretty close fit to the figures released recently...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 23:38 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Mandat wrote:
P.S. Hi Paul and everyone else at Safe Speed. I have been lurking on here ever since the forum started and have decided that its time to start making a contribution to the discussions.


Wow, all that time! Thanks for 'delurking' and welcome!

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 04, 2005 23:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Twister wrote:
Figures from the CIA World Factbook give an estimated 615,000 deaths/year in the UK. Using the 1 in 200 figure mentioned by cotswold would then give a little over 3000 road-related deaths per year - a pretty close fit to the figures released recently...


Yes, 1 in 200 is a reasonable estimate for the lifetime risk of dying in a road crash based on current figures. Of course it isn't really right because the risk changes over a lifetime. In the late 1960s it was about 1 in 100, and in 2030 if we get things right it'll be about 1 in 400.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 07:27 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
SafeSpeed wrote:
and in 2030 if we get things right it'll be about 1 in 400.


On the other hand if we live longer the probability goes up again... :roll:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 07:45 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 10:42
Posts: 155
Gizmo wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
and in 2030 if we get things right it'll be about 1 in 400.


On the other hand if we live longer the probability goes up again... :roll:

Probability of dying is, and always has been, 1. Everything else is just quibbling.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 07:51 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
Einion Yrth wrote:
Probability of dying is, and always has been, 1. Everything else is just quibbling.


I think you have missed the point. If there were no deaths from illness due to medical progress EVERYONE would eventualy die in an accident of some sort or another...think about it :wink:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 08:50 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
cotswold wrote:
Think I'll drop her a line and offer her a passenger ride...she's on my patch....

Ever thought about making that a full time service?

Think about it for a minute......

Take a retired police driver trained copper and offer (say) 1 hour sessions where you & the "customer" drive a preset course.
15 minutes driving by the "customer" (to observe faults & bad habits)
15 minutes driving by the copper (to show the customer how it should be done)
30 minutes to discuss any faults & bad habits and possibly help the customer to eradicate them.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 10:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 15:13
Posts: 269
Gizmo wrote:
Einion Yrth wrote:
Probability of dying is, and always has been, 1. Everything else is just quibbling.


I think you have missed the point. If there were no deaths from illness due to medical progress EVERYONE would eventualy die in an accident of some sort or another...think about it :wink:


Wouldn't it be a crowded island with one fatality per driver per 210,000 years or so?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 13:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 13:40
Posts: 70
Gizmo wrote:
... EVERYONE would eventualy die in an accident of some sort or another...think about it :wink:


Old age isn't really an accident. A lot of people die because of that.

I do see your point though.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 17:58 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Gizmo wrote:
1 in 200 chance of dying in a road accident sounds like good odds to me.


There are 40 odd houses in my street, with a few people living in each one. At those odds, the chances are that one of my neighbours will be killed by a car.

To put it in perspective, if you had time bombs buried in your gardens, and you knew that one would go off at some time, and kill you or one of your neighbours prematurely, and another 40 or 80 would go off over the course of the years, and hurt and/or maim your family or neighbours, you'd bloody well clear the mines if you had any sense!

Yet we are so mesmerised with car culture that the same odds on the roads don't phase some of us!

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 18:46 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
basingwerk wrote:
Gizmo wrote:
1 in 200 chance of dying in a road accident sounds like good odds to me.


There are 40 odd houses in my street, with a few people living in each one. At those odds, the chances are that one of my neighbours will be killed by a car.

To put it in perspective, if you had time bombs buried in your gardens, and you knew that one would go off at some time, and kill you or one of your neighbours prematurely, and another 40 or 80 would go off over the course of the years, and hurt and/or maim your family or neighbours, you'd bloody well clear the mines if you had any sense!

Yet we are so mesmerised with car culture that the same odds on the roads don't phase some of us!


And would you equate the usefulness and convenience of time bombs buried in your garden, and motor vehicles, BW? You'd have to to draw that perspective.

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 05, 2005 18:47 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
basingwerk wrote:
Yet we are so mesmerised with car culture that the same odds on the roads don't phase some of us!

Well, we all have to die of something, and a cause that accounts for 1 in 200 deaths is well down the list, certainly behind dying from a fire or accident in the home, or dying from an infection contracted in hospital.

Also if you take your use of the roads seriously, look where you're going and don't accept lifts from drunks and people without licences, your chances will be a damn sight better than 1 in 200.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 11 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.069s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]