Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Nov 11, 2025 01:51

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 19:47 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
During the crisis in London I remember there were calls from Transport-for-London for car drivers to help get stranded passengers out of the capital. I bet they never cancelled the conjestion charge for the day though..... :x

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 19:50 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
stackmonkey wrote:
I was following local bus this morning in chesterfield with an advert non the back with the phrase:

" Cars block more than roads - Just ask a child with asthma"

complete with picture of an inhaler.

Quite apart from the lack of proof of cars causing asthma, I was distinctly aware (an an asthma sufferer myself) of the clouds of black smoke being emitted from the same bus every time it accelerated after each speed bump on the road we were both travelling on.

The ad is sponsored by derbyshire County Council and Travelwise.


What uninformed rot! Due to a number of causes - and buses are so poorly maintained that they pollute far more than a whole motorway rush hour jam of cars - most of which re modern with much lower CO2 emissions.

Have a long list of modern day items which trig an asthma attack - and household cleaning agents and strong women's perfuimes are far more dangerous.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 20:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2005 19:14
Posts: 410
Gizmo wrote:
During the crisis in London I remember there were calls from Transport-for-London for car drivers to help get stranded passengers out of the capital. I bet they never cancelled the conjestion charge for the day though..... :x

I think they did cancel the congestion charge for the day on 7/7, just saying this from memory, so I could be wrong.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 21:09 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
SafeSpeed wrote:
Rewolf wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I hate cats.


Yes, nasty cute looking creatures that decimate the local wildlife population. I know because the one that lives with us regulaly leaves the undegistable remains just outside the house. :)


... electrified bowl of milk.


:?

:shock:

:yikes:

:cry:


Though somehow I don't think Wildy :neko: needs any more sparks to get her fur flying :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 21:16 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Ernest Marsh wrote:
PeterE wrote:
Rewolf wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I hate cats.

Yes, nasty cute looking creatures that decimate the local wildlife population.

And which crap on my lawn too :x

But, as you say, they do look cute Image

Ah, but have you ever looked into the mouth of one? As it is about to bite you, they look hideous!
Sorry Mad Moggie, I just tell it how it is!!! :oops: Please pass on my apologies to your extended (extensive?) family! :D


Take it you've met our Persian then! Dogs are subservient to it - scary sight if in a strop - almost like my wife ... :bunker: :bunker: :bunker: - she with the steely eyed glint ... :bunker: :bunker:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 21:17 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
FJSRiDER wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Three adults and four children from Staveley to Windermere costs £13 There is still a 3/4 mile walk to my home - one adult and two of the children still have a 1 1/4 mile walk!
The vast majority of cars can't carry seven passingers though.

I would say that the comparison still holds good though, on the grounds that if you have a need to carry 7 passengers you will make a point of equipping yourself with one of the minority vehicles that does carry 7.

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2005 21:24 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Ernest Marsh wrote:
FJSRiDER wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Three adults and four children from Staveley to Windermere costs £13 There is still a 3/4 mile walk to my home - one adult and two of the children still have a 1 1/4 mile walk!
The vast majority of cars can't carry seven passingers though.

They are becoming more popular - but it is still cheaper to take two cars as the distance is a mere 2 3/4 miles!
I'm not sure, but I suspect the bus company receives a subsidy too, and the buses are not exactly new either - perhaps IanH could confirm!!!
They pump out smoke and oil in large amounts as anyone following one especially on a bike can attest to!


Yes - can certainly confirm the smoke and oil!

Bus fares are expensive and defineitley cheaper for me to transport the "litter" :roll: by car - and we do use both cars as well - cheaper.

Mentioned the fee for the school bus alone. When you have six of school age - it's an outlay. William (our eldest) has been in charge of the school run this year - and it's back to bus or a drop off next year until the twins strat driving anyway.

Buses get a subsidy still - but this, as I understand, is to subsidise pensioner passes.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2005 07:38 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
JT wrote:
FJSRiDER wrote:
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Three adults and four children from Staveley to Windermere costs £13 There is still a 3/4 mile walk to my home - one adult and two of the children still have a 1 1/4 mile walk!
The vast majority of cars can't carry seven passingers though.

I would say that the comparison still holds good though, on the grounds that if you have a need to carry 7 passengers you will make a point of equipping yourself with one of the minority vehicles that does carry 7.

I miss my Renault Espace! :cry:
Polycarbonate body - lightweight and no rust, TRUE SEVEN SEATS, which can be removed, not folded flat so you can use it as a van, LAODS of cabin space, and compartments (800 fags in each door pocket when returning from Continental holidays!), great turning circle and vision, and only a few inches longer than an Escort estate, and not as high as a Discovery.
Mine was a 2.0 litre Diesel, L regd and used to turn in 38 mpg even when dashing across France at 90 mph.
I wish I had another one! :oops:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 17:19 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
I've received a (disappointing) reply from the ASA. I'll scan/copy it up when i can, hopefully soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 18:35 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
Gizmo wrote:
London still run a few Routemasters...they first went into service 50 years ago... :o


Ahh, but they did get a thourough overall, fitting new low-emmision Iveco engines as well as new gearboxes. But thats the bizarre thing, some of them didn't finish being refurbed till well into 2004, yet they are all being withdrawn. What a great waste of money. Getting rid of the Routemasters was a stupid decision in my opinion.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 20:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
They're getting rid of Routemasters? :o WTH for? I know it was talked about some years ago on safety grounds... some bureautwats worrying about the lack of a door letting bodies fly out of them on roundabouts I heard. But in the end the (very sensible I felt) thinking was (a) Routemasters are part of London's appeal and tourists expect to see 'em, and (b) don't fall out. I'm no bus fanatic but I'd be sad to see Routemasters go. To me they're part of what makes London look like London. And even though it's normally a pretty bloody awful way of getting around at least they've got a solitary redeeming feature of looking good. Getting rid of them is like recladding the Natural History Museum in modern bricks because, you know, it's looking a little bit Victorian like that. Or knocking down St Pauls because a nice new concrete cathedral would match the area better now than that shabby old Wren effort and be less hassle to maintain. Only in this country can TPTB behave like this. Can you imagine the uproar if the people who run Venice said they were going to get rid of all the gondolas and replace them with fidbreglass jobs with outboards. The Venetians would take 'em out and chuck them in the nearest canal.

Sorry for the off topic rant, but this seems like yet another thing destined to make this country just that little more bland and depressing. :cry:

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 20:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
Can't agree with you more Gatsobait! The last I heard was that the few remaining routes operated by Routemasters were due to be run with new bendy buses by October of this year, with one route surviving until December. It probably won't be the end completly however as a couple of heritage routes will be set up, but will probably be short and expensive.

It's a mystery why they had to go. Originally they were argued to be too polluting, so they kitted many out with new (modern)engines and transmissions. They also re-furbed all the interiors. Now they say they have to go because they don't have disabled access. Now don't get me wrong, I fully support better disabled access but there was no reason why the Routemasters couldn't supplement modern buses.

Despite how it may seem I'm not a bus enthusiast either, but on hearing the news of their demise I did a bit of digging around as I wanted to find out why. Afterall these buses work! They are excellent at getting people on and off quickly in the confines of the city, probably the best bus for cities EVER built. And as you rightly say Gatso, a good looking one at that. It's a shame, a big shame.

Why do we have to rip up something that works just becuase it's old? Nothing has come close to replacing it. Is this progress?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Aug 08, 2005 22:25 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
Gizmo wrote:
During the crisis in London I remember there were calls from Transport-for-London for car drivers to help get stranded passengers out of the capital. I bet they never cancelled the conjestion charge for the day though..... :x


They did suspend the congestion charge on July 7.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 13:14 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
please find below the text of the letter from the ASA.

"Thank you for your recent complaint, submitted via our online form.

I understand that you regarded the advertisement as misleading because you thought it implied cars can cause asthma, and because busses emit more fine particulates than cars and are therefore worse polluters. However, we are unable to pursue the matter as it is unlikely that the advertisers have breached our Code.

We considered that the majority of viewers would have a basic knowledge of the issues surrounding respiratory problems and pollution. In our opinion, the advertisement did not claim that claim that vehicle emissions cause asthma; rather, the claim “just ask a child with asthma” would be interpreted to mean that pollution from cars could exacerbate the symptoms. We understand that there is a body of evidence available to demonstrate that.

The advertisement was promoting the use of public transport, encouraging readers to travel by bus instead of car. In this instance, the advertisers were persuading car drivers to choose an alternative form of transport with the headline “Don’t block it – bus it”. In reducing the number of cars on the road, exhaust emissions from and vehicle congestion would also be reduced. The pollution from one bus would be lower than that emitted from, potentially, 70 or so cars (regardless of whether busses emit more particulates on average).

I realise this outcome will disappoint you, but thank you for taking the time to lodge your complaint with us.

Our website, www.asa.org.uk contains information about the ASA and the work we do, including the results of our investigations into other recent complaints."

Disappointing yes, but mainly for repeating the utter cobblers about busses (sic) replacing 70 cars.. :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Aug 09, 2005 20:20 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Obviously it's not what you know, it's who you know.

The ASA website has numerous examples of complaints being upheld on the most absurd technicalities. But as long as you say something in line with government dogma in your ad, even blatant lies are ok.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 10, 2005 08:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 16:12
Posts: 1040
Location: West Midlands
Obviously it's not what you know, it's who pays you.... :x


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 11, 2005 10:33 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
SafeSpeed wrote:
Rewolf wrote:
Except that if the old one is pre-cat then it will be substantially more polluting than later ones...


Even that isn't clear. It takes 15 tons of mountain and god knows how much energy to get the precious metals for just one cat.

And the pollutants that the cat takes out aren't stable in the atmosphere and break down completely in a day or two - unless you're in one of the two cities in the world that suffer from photochemical smog due to weather and geography (Los Angeles and Athens).

And if CO2 is really a problem the cat makes it about 10% worse. (8% clearly shown in the table above, top right two figures).

(edited to add:) And the cat only does what is say on the box once it's good and hot, and for a limited life (gradually gets 'poisoned'). Lots of short runs (school runs?) and the cat never gets up to temp...

I hate cats.


I had always assumed catalysers were a good thing. This site is educational as well as entertaining.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 57 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.028s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]