Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 12, 2026 12:16

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 07:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
About 5.30 or so yesterday afternoon, I left home & approached the top of the road (cul de sac) where we live & stopped at the junction. I had already noticed 5 or 6 kids who were playing on the pavement right outside the corner house, but only gave them a cursory glance as they all appeared to notice my approach.
Anyway, I look right, look left, look right again and start pulling away from the junction (turning left). Pretty much as soon as I pull away, I feel a bump underneath the car, along with the rear nearside of the car lifting slightly.
My first thought was that a toddler had run out and he/she was under the wheels, especially as there was a 13 year old or so girl who was screaming blue murder & crying (it's a scary thought, believe me folks).

Anyway, it turns out that the kids have let their dog go just as I am executing my left turn and it ran underneath the car. By the time I had got out of the car (which I stopped immediately), the dog was already legging it up the road at a speed that would have earned it an instant ban if it had been driving itself.

The question is a simple one (although not that simple for me obviously), am I legally obliged to report the fact I ran over a dog?
I know it used to be a legal requirement, but I'm pretty sure that it was done away with some years ago.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 08:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
CYA principle - I'd go report it, and if they say it's not necessary it's only cost a little time.

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 09:19 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
Section 170 of the Road Traffic Act 1988 states:-
Quote:
170(1) If, owing to the presence of a mechanically propelled vehicle on a road or other public place an accident occurs whereby-
  1. personal injury is caused to a person other than the driver of that mechanically propelled vehicle, OR
  2. damage is caused-
    1. to a vehicle other than that mechanically propelled vehicle or a trailer drawn by that mechanically propelled vehicle, OR
    2. to an animal* other than an animal in or on that mechanically propelled vehicle or a trailer drawn by that mechanically propelled vehicle, OR
    3. to any other property constructed on, fixed to, growing in or otherwise forming part of the land on which the road or place in question is situated or land adjacent to such land.
170(2) The driver of the mechanically propelled vehicle must stop and, if required to do so by any person having reasonable grounds for so requiring, give his name and address and also the name and address of the owner and the identification marks of the vehicle.

170(3) If for any reason the driver of the mechanically propelled vehicle does not give his name and address under subsection (2) above, he must report the accident.

170(4) A person who fails to comply with the above requirements is guilty of an offence.




*"Animal" - means horse, cattle, ass, mule, sheep, pig, goat or dog.


Still a requirement to stop/report, Gixxer.

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 09:33 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
Yup, rang my local plod at 9am this morning after Gatsobait's advice and found that to be the case Ian (well sort of anyway).

Turns out that I had already complied with the law by virtue of the fact that I stopped & spoke with the owner (who is one of my neighbours)
Just to be on the safe side, the officer took my report of the incident just in case the owner decides to pursue it further (although the officer did state that it was the owners fault anyway).

Off to the station now to produce my docs so that they can be tied to the report in the event of the dog's owner attempting to take action against me.

Many thanks anyway Ian.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 09:44 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
Yep, I should have added that if you have given details to the family - (name and address) or if they know you, that's all that's required.
I answered the point in a general legal sense rather than relating to your specific circumstance. :oops:

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 09:54 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
IanH wrote:
I answered the point in a general legal sense rather than relating to your specific circumstance. :oops:

No need for the "sad" face Ian, it gave me all the info I needed to know.

On a side note, do you think the dog ran under my car because it was chasing the cat (alyst)? :lol:


EDIT:
I know the above joke might be considered poor taste for some, but the dog has since been found & the vet has said that although it has quite a few broken bones, it will live & be none the worse for it's experience.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 10:06 
Offline
Police Officer and Member
Police Officer and Member

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 22:53
Posts: 565
Location: Kendal
Gixxer wrote:
IanH wrote:
I answered the point in a general legal sense rather than relating to your specific circumstance. :oops:

No need for the "sad" face Ian, it gave me all the info I needed to know.



I was trying to display 'slight embarrassment' rather than 'sad' :D

Glad to hear that Mutt's on the mend.

_________________
Fixed ideas are like cramp, for instance in the foot, yet the best remedy is to step on them.

Ian


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]