johno1066 wrote:
REMEMBER - SAFETY CAMERAS ARE WORKING IN THAMES VALLEY
Where the cameras have been working in Thames Valley, results from an independent report have shown that the number of people being killed or seriously injured has fallen by 43%.
Yep, they're working alright cough cough!!
43%..?? A mere bagatelle... Amateurs...!
In Shrewsbury, the mere
proposal to instal a camera in Smithfield Street reduced accidents by 76% - "65 accidents, seven of them serious, during 1999 to 2001" became "just 16 crashes causing injuries, with one serious collision over the last three years" according to the local partnership spokesperson. (The three years is because they couldn't find a decent site for it, and indeed never did..)
So.. A
virtual camera is more effective than a real one... And nobody got fined, nobody got points and nobody got "totted up" as a result.
I've written in a similar vein to the local paper saying, in essence, that if ever there was proof that cameras do damn-all here it is - from the pratnership itself.. A proven, demonstrable case of RTTM.