Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 10, 2025 18:39

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 17:19 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4414370.stm

Quote:
The "undue emphasis on the role of speed cameras" by police could be scrutinised by the new chief constable in charge of road policing.
On his first day in the job, Meredydd Hughes said a wider range of measures should be used to make roads safer.

Money from speeding fines could be better spent on "warning signage and better road engineering", he added.

The South Yorkshire chief constable also suggested motorists should re-take driving tests at regular intervals.

Road conditions had changed in the 30 years since he had taken his test.

But however long ago they had passed, drivers were never asked to prove their competence again, Chief Constable Hughes, from the Association of Chief Police Officers, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme.

"Driving is a privilege - not a right.

I want drivers to be given a fairer crack of the whip in terms of knowing what they should be doing in any one location

Chief Constable Meredydd Hughes

"We have got to up-skill, improve the level of driving in the UK and change the culture."

An automatic number-plate recognition system linking "road policing directly back into mainstream policing" would also "help us deny criminals the use of the road", he added.

Chief Constable Hughes, who has been caught by speed cameras twice himself, told Today more signs, satellite navigation and mobile phone systems should be used to remind motorists of speed limits.

"I want drivers to be given a fairer crack of the whip in terms of knowing what they should be doing in any one location."

Chief Constable Hughes added 10 people were killed on Britain's roads every day.

"We have got to do something about getting those numbers down."

There are now 6,000 speed cameras in the UK - 2,500 of them are mobile.

And the number of camera fines has risen from 200,000 in 1995 to more than two million last year.

'Temporary measure'

But transport researchers have found removing white lines, or narrowing streets have just as much effect in cutting drivers' speed.

Ben Hamilton-Baillie, of European road safety and environment scheme Shared Space, told Today there were many "visual and psychological techniques" that would change driver behaviour.

Making roads look narrower by colouring their edges or planting trees on the pavement increases a driver's sense of danger, making them more conscious of oncoming traffic, he added.

Speed cameras were a "temporary measure" that "may have had their day", Mr Hamilton-Baillie said.


_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 17:31 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
money from speeding fines would be better off in my pocket where it was in the first place!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 17:46 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Quote:
An automatic number-plate recognition system linking "road policing directly back into mainstream policing" would also "help us deny criminals the use of the road", he added.


It was reported in my local paper two weeks ago that 4 local residents had their front and rear numberplates stolen in one night. This will become a much bigger problem now we have ANPR. I don't think it will stop the real criminals.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 17:53 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 12:09
Posts: 115
Location: South West
I think that the only thing that stops real criminals is getting their collar felt. However, I do think there is a glimmer of hope with the appointment of the new Chief of roads policing. At least some of what he has said makes sense, he's not so anti-motorist as the last, and it's only his first day in the job.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 18:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
Dixie wrote:
It was reported in my local paper two weeks ago that 4 local residents had their front and rear numberplates stolen in one night. This will become a much bigger problem now we have ANPR. I don't think it will stop the real criminals.

Anyone ever bought numberplates on the internet? I just found this site, looked through the Ts and Cs and can't find anything about having to produce the V5 or other docs. One of our cars failed its MOT last year on a cracked front plate, and even though we're known at the garage they still said new legisation meant we had to bring docs in before they'd knock up another one. But if you can buy plates online what's the point? Hypothetically (since I wouldn't actually do this) what's stopping me transposing a couple of characters when ordering the plate since it's not being checked against anything AFAICT, and then cheerfully ignoring the speed cameras? ANPR? So I just drive around until I find another same make and model car as I have, jot down the number and order those replacement plates. Probably even better since I'd know I had a real registration number, just not mine.

Could this be happening already?

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 18:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
Gatsobait wrote:
Anyone ever bought numberplates on the internet? I just found this site, looked through the Ts and Cs and can't find anything about having to produce the V5 or other docs.

The legislation only applies to England (poss Wales also), fancyplates is based in Omagh and there is no law against importing any sort of plate.

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 18:38 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
Gatsobait wrote:
Hypothetically (since I wouldn't actually do this) what's stopping me transposing a couple of characters when ordering the plate since it's not being checked against anything AFAICT, and then cheerfully ignoring the speed cameras? ANPR? So I just drive around until I find another same make and model car as I have, jot down the number and order those replacement plates. Probably even better since I'd know I had a real registration number, just not mine.

Could this be happening already?


It's called "cloning" and it IS happening already. It is not known exactly how widespread the cloning problem is because of the almost total reliance of Police on cameras and other automated systems (which are completely "fooled" by the cloners) for policing the roads.

The Police are not giving the problem any degree of priority, as Section 172 ensures that the innocent owner of the "original" car has to pay the cloner's speeding fines (unless he has a cast iron alibi). As long as the speed camera cabal get their money, they don't care.

You are also correct about being able to get plates made up without the V5 & 2 forms of ID, as long as you sign a disclaimer saying they're for "off-road use only". It's a loophole in the law that will probably be closed soon.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 19:23 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
antera309 wrote:
It's called "cloning" and it IS happening already. It is not known exactly how widespread the cloning problem is because of the almost total reliance of Police on cameras and other automated systems (which are completely "fooled" by the cloners) for policing the roads.

and it doesn't help that you're not required to actually carry your licence while driving. Rather bizarre that one.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 19:33 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
johnsher wrote:
antera309 wrote:
It's called "cloning" and it IS happening already. It is not known exactly how widespread the cloning problem is because of the almost total reliance of Police on cameras and other automated systems (which are completely "fooled" by the cloners) for policing the roads.

and it doesn't help that you're not required to actually carry your licence while driving. Rather bizarre that one.


Do you really think it should be an offence to pick up the wrong jacket on the way out of the house?

And what about the millions who decide that they have to leave their licence in the car to be sure of complying with the law? Very good until the car is stolen.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 21:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
SafeSpeed wrote:
Do you really think it should be an offence to pick up the wrong jacket on the way out of the house?

And what about the millions who decide that they have to leave their licence in the car to be sure of complying with the law? Very good until the car is stolen.

do you leave home without your wallet or purse? Thought not. Nobody has a problem carrying a licence in Australia, why is it such an issue here?? (I carry mine at all times regardless).
If you've honestly just forgotten it then they do usually play nice... especially if you happen to know your licence number.
It would certainly make policing a whole lot easier - none of the "honest guv, I'll be around the station tomorrow" never to be seen again rubbish.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 22:22 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 14:26
Posts: 4364
Location: Hampshire/Wiltshire Border
I'm not sure what benefit compulsory carrying of your licence has if most enforcement is done via automated means which don't stop you at the time.

There is an ID card type argument here as well.

I assume your argument is that if the police stop a "cloned" car and ask the driver who he is there is some proof if licences must be carried. What should the penalty be for not carrying the documents? Instant trip to the clink or a "producer" the next day?

_________________
Malcolm W.
The views expressed in this post are personal opinions and do not represent the views of Safespeed.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 23:42 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
malcolmw wrote:
I assume your argument is that if the police stop a "cloned" car and ask the driver who he is there is some proof if licences must be carried. What should the penalty be for not carrying the documents? Instant trip to the clink or a "producer" the next day?

well in Oz it goes like this.. if you're asked for your licence and can't produce it you're asked who owns the car - they often ask this anyway if they've already checked your plates and you're obviously not the owner (like when driving the parents car). If your answer doesn't match who they think the car belongs to I'm guessing you're going to be in a whole lot of trouble. Clearly the current UK situation of a producer on a cloned or untraceable car is never going to work.
For the rest of society, the worst case is that you'll get a fine for not carrying your licence.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 00:17 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 23, 2004 18:33
Posts: 24
Quote:
Ben Hamilton-Baillie, of European road safety and environment scheme Shared Space, told Today there were many "visual and psychological techniques" that would change driver behaviour.

Making roads look narrower by colouring their edges or planting trees on the pavement increases a driver's sense of danger, making them more conscious of oncoming traffic, he added.

Speed cameras were a "temporary measure" that "may have had their day", Mr Hamilton-Baillie said.


The extensive studies carried out by traffic consultants Martin R Parker & Associates during the late eighties and early nineties clearly demonstrated that vehicle speeds are unaffected by merely changing the speed limit signs along a given stretch of road. Drivers' speeds are influenced by road design, layout and the presence of obstacles and hazards. This government and local authorties have cynically exploited this proven behavioural characteristic, allowing them to implement a venomous policy of tactical enforcement. I argued this point on a number of occasions on the old CSCP forum and got little by way of effective counter-argument from the hosts. My parting shot on the CSCP forum, which covers this matter, is posted here.

Well, at last it would appear the long-overdue payback time has arrived... :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 01:34 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
johnsher wrote:
malcolmw wrote:
I assume your argument is that if the police stop a "cloned" car and ask the driver who he is there is some proof if licences must be carried. What should the penalty be for not carrying the documents? Instant trip to the clink or a "producer" the next day?

well in Oz it goes like this.. if you're asked for your licence and can't produce it you're asked who owns the car - they often ask this anyway if they've already checked your plates and you're obviously not the owner (like when driving the parents car). If your answer doesn't match who they think the car belongs to I'm guessing you're going to be in a whole lot of trouble. Clearly the current UK situation of a producer on a cloned or untraceable car is never going to work.
For the rest of society, the worst case is that you'll get a fine for not carrying your licence.

Actually, if I understand correctly, the law in the UK does actually state that you must carry your documentation, except that there is an exemption written in to allow documents to be produced within 7 days, but only if the officer is satisfied as to the identity of the driver.

So if you can't prove who you are by some reasonable means, then plod already has the power to insist you accompany him to the station to assist with his enquiries. Should he stop me and I have no paperwork in the car I would expect that me being able to recite the registration number, my name, address and driver number etc. would convince him that I am who I say I am and I could then be issued with a "producer".

This seems a perfectly reasonable and proportionate way to deal with cloners etc, but without unduly inconveniencing legal road users. I just can't see how any further intrusive legislation (such as having to carry ID) would benefit anyone. Lets be honest, the only people that would tend to get caught without ID would be honest people who've forgotten it or whatever, any self-respecting criminal will make damn sure he's got something in his wallet that passes muster., by the same mechanism which dictates that con men always appear to be convincingly honest! :lol:

_________________
CSCP Latin for beginners...
Ticketo ergo sum : I scam therefore I am!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 17:33 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
Quote:
Making roads look narrower by colouring their edges or planting trees on the pavement increases a driver's sense of danger, making them more conscious of oncoming traffic, he added.


This is crying wolf, if used inappropriately where the danger does not really exist, and may lead to drivers unconciously ignoring real danger signs.


Last edited by Zamzara on Wed Nov 09, 2005 14:04, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 17:57 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
Quote:
Making roads look narrower by colouring their edges or planting trees on the pavement increases a driver's sense of danger, making them more conscious of oncoming traffic, he added.


There may be something in this. At least you are concentrating the driver's attention in the right place (i.e, the road) rather than at the speedo, behind direction signs, at Contractors' vans parked in laybys etc.

The chevrons that were used on the M1 that guided people on the correct distance between them and the car in front was a good example of road markings being used to concentrate drivers' attention in the right place.

However, there is a very fine line between this approach and "traffic calming". A bit of red paint on a known dangerous road is acceptable. foot-high concrete chicanes are not. I'm not sure I could trust them to make the distinction.

The measures would have to be carefully considered too - it would be all too easy for additional road "furniture" to make a road MORE dangerous, e.g. trees obstructing drivers' view of pedestrians waiting to cross the road or vehicles waiting at side turnings.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 19:28 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
JT wrote:
Lets be honest, the only people that would tend to get caught without ID would be honest people who've forgotten it or whatever, any self-respecting criminal will make damn sure he's got something in his wallet that passes muster., by the same mechanism which dictates that con men always appear to be convincingly honest! :lol:

that's true but if "Mr Smith" is driving around in a car with plates belonging to "Mrs Jones" then plod may think to ask a few more questions. Unless cloners are also into stealing identities now.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 11:03 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
johnsher wrote:
JT wrote:
Lets be honest, the only people that would tend to get caught without ID would be honest people who've forgotten it or whatever, any self-respecting criminal will make damn sure he's got something in his wallet that passes muster., by the same mechanism which dictates that con men always appear to be convincingly honest! :lol:

that's true but if "Mr Smith" is driving around in a car with plates belonging to "Mrs Jones" then plod may think to ask a few more questions. Unless cloners are also into stealing identities now.

How will they know the difference without stopping the vehicle? If the plate displays W123XYZ and it's on the right model and colour of car how will they know if it's really W123XYZ just by looking? And let's face it, all ANPR does is look at the plate. Sure you could randomly stop every thrid or fourth vehicle to pass the ANPR van and give 'em a quick check, which would probably catch or put off plate swappers. But if you're going to do that why bother with the ANPR van in the first place?

_________________
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler - Einstein


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:08 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 00:04
Posts: 2311
Gatsobait wrote:
How will they know the difference without stopping the vehicle? If the plate displays W123XYZ and it's on the right model and colour of car how will they know if it's really W123XYZ just by looking?

they won't. What's wrong with RBT (as in random breath testing)? Or automatically checking every time another offence is noted? ie forget about the automated rubbish and stick with real police.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: ANPR and ownership
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2005 21:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Nov 05, 2005 19:53
Posts: 234
A major concern is the DVLA's admission that one third of the vehicles on the road are not registered to the owner, so any data-base checks (ANPR, road fund license etc) are negated.

Looking on the brighter side, I have it on good authority that the Police are to be given new powers soon, i.e. if they stop a vehicle and the driver cannot prove to the Police's satisfaction that he is who he claims to be, it's instant arrest and off to the cells until they find out who he really is.

This will probably upset the civil libertarians, but I for one have ALWAYS got something on me which would dispel any doubts.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.041s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]