Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 12:49

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 07:28 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Safe Speed issued the following PR at 06:05 this morning:

PR258: 'Excessive speed' crashes increasing in the speed camera era

news: for immediate release

In response to a parliamentary question, Dr Ladyman (roads minister) revealed
that 'excessive speed' crashes have increased markedly in recent years as
the speed camera programme has expanded.

Percentage of crashes involving 'excessive speed':

Year fatal serious

1999 29% 12%
2000 26% 12%
2001 27% 12%
2002 30% 13%
2003 30% 14%
2004 34% 13%

Paul Smith, founder of the Safe Speed road safety campaign
(www.safespeed.org.uk) said: "It's no surprise to me that 'excessive speed'
crashes are increasing as speed camera expand. Speed cameras give a series of
false safety messages. One important false message is that 'if you're not
exceeding the limit your speed is safe'. Nothing could be further from
the truth, yet we have millions of motorists who now regard the speedometer as
a barometer of safety."

"We need drivers who respond to hazards and slow down in areas of danger.
Obeying the speed limit is no substitute for this vital and commonplace
driver behaviour, yet the government appears to wish motorists to drive at the
speed limit."

"If speed cameras did not reduce 'excessive speed' crashes they would be
useless. But if excessive speed crashes increase as speed cameras increase
then speed cameras are deadly. That's exactly what we're seeing and exactly
what I've long been predicting. Speed cameras have proved to be a fatal
mistake."

<ends>

Notes for editors
=================

Commons Hansard containing the new figures:
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 122w19.htm

The next Hansard page provides the following table of the numbers of
additional fixed speed cameras installed each year since 1994:

1994 54
1995 133
1996 146
1997 160
1998 221
1999 183
2000 172
2001 200
2002 245
2003 312
2004 304

Spreadsheet containing the figures above, plus the accumulated total and a
graph:
http://www.safespeed.org.uk/pr258.xls

Image file of graph:
Image

An 'excessive speed' crash is one where Police have recorded 'excessive speed'
as one contributory factor out of a number of contributory factors. 'Excessive
speed' in these terms includes BOTH speed in excess of a speed limit AND speed
inappropriate for the conditions. Sample data indicates that 'inappropriate
speed is by far the more common type with at least 95% of all road crashes
taking place entirely within the speed limit.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 08:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 11:19
Posts: 1795
How much of these extras are due to either a) lowered limits so the same speed is now excess speed and b) political correctness in reporting? It is possible little has changed apart from the above factors and people are driving as well/badly as they always have :)

Is there anything in Stats 19 reporting/police reports about defective suspension being present? Excessive speed accidents (if there is no other party involved) are often on twisty, bumpy roads. I'd love to know if the proportion of cars invovlved in accidents with defective suspension was on the increase in those type of these accidents and in all accidents. If defective suspension could be implicated in at least 20% of them then you're looking at a reason to have all humps removed and all roads free from pot holes on serious safety grounds.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 09:44 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
So speed cameras are working, then. :clap1:

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 13:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 16:34
Posts: 923
Location: UK
My guess is that the number of crashes caused by speed is the same, it's just that police officers are putting it down as a cause more often, either because of the increased awareness of speed as a factor, or that they have been told to do so to give greater justification of speed enforcement.

Gareth


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 13:43 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
g_attrill wrote:
My guess is that the number of crashes caused by speed is the same, it's just that police officers are putting it down as a cause more often, either because of the increased awareness of speed as a factor, or that they have been told to do so to give greater justification of speed enforcement.


That's highly unlikely for fatal crashes (which is an excellent reason for choosing that indicator) because the standard of investigation is so high.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 25, 2005 15:22 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
I am bound to ask the honourable gentleman if speed cameras cannot reduce excessive speed accidents.....then what is their purpose?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 01:27 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
That would seem to be the obvious question ... shame Mrs Dunwoody didn't ask it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 03:01 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
orange wrote:
That would seem to be the obvious question ... shame Mrs Dunwoody didn't ask it.


There's still time...

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Nov 26, 2005 22:21 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 10:47
Posts: 920
Location: South Bucks
civil engineer wrote:
I am bound to ask the honourable gentleman if speed cameras cannot reduce excessive speed accidents.....then what is their purpose?


If the medicine's not working, we need to increase the dose. :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 27, 2005 00:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
:clap:

(a sarcastic one though)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 28, 2005 11:33 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Gizmo wrote:
Somebody said Ladyman was on Top Gear last night....missed it. Anybody know what happened?


Did you notice the topic Ladyman on Top Gear (This forum) There's some discussion about it there.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 368 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.014s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]