Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 10, 2025 02:36

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 10:28 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Here's the current bill:

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 006113.pdf

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 16:12 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
One might wonder what good it may do, what changes therein will have any effect on the average driver and why they are bothering to take parliamentary time for this.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 18:21 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
If Tony's bringing in ammendments/new laws, be certain that hidden in the small print is something nasty --like bit about vehicle examiners giving FPN - ONLY GOODS AT MOMENT -but where will that lead - we've got a private force on the motorways, what next a private testinf environment for cars ( thinking alonf lines of something money making like emmissions at roadside)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 19:57 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
6 points for s172 :o
what about the proposal for thegraduation of points with regard to speeding, i cannot find it

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 20:13 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
camera operator wrote:
6 points for s172 :o
what about the proposal for thegraduation of points with regard to speeding, i cannot find it


Page 2 - items 3/4 - fixed penalties and graduated points.try page 6 item 4

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 20:21 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
i'll let the boffins translate and wait for the delegation

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 20:24 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
camera operator wrote:
i'll let the boffins translate and wait for the delegation


Thats my view - anything Tone does usually says more
in the fine print - someone said somewhere else that there was a provision to force id cards on us as the "new " driving licence in this bill.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 23:01 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I saw some of the debate on Parliament Tv (Freeview). Ladyman made a very interesting slip. He said they were looking at speed limit signing in camera zones "so that people would know what speed they were supposed to be driving at".

Oh yeah? So the speed limit is a target is it? Can't wait to see it in Hansard... :)

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 08:42 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2006 23:17
Posts: 499
SafeSpeed wrote:
I saw some of the debate on Parliament Tv (Freeview). Ladyman made a very interesting slip. He said they were looking at speed limit signing in camera zones "so that people would know what speed they were supposed to be driving at".

Oh yeah? So the speed limit is a target is it? Can't wait to see it in Hansard... :)


It just goes to show how warped road safety has become.

I was reading a previous post by a police officer, that stated nowdays it was common place for people involved in accidents to exonerate themselves form any blame by saying "i wasn't speeding"!!!!

I think all this focus on speed limits and speed cameras and enforcement has distorted public opinion of what constitues safe driving.

Compliance with speed limits appears to be the number one road safety priority in some individual's minds; any kind of dangerous conduct on the road is absolutely fine provided its not over the speed limit.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 09:00 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 15:14
Posts: 420
Location: Aberdeenshire
T2006 wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I saw some of the debate on Parliament Tv (Freeview). Ladyman made a very interesting slip. He said they were looking at speed limit signing in camera zones "so that people would know what speed they were supposed to be driving at".

Oh yeah? So the speed limit is a target is it? Can't wait to see it in Hansard... :)


It just goes to show how warped road safety has become.

I was reading a previous post by a police officer, that stated nowdays it was common place for people involved in accidents to exonerate themselves form any blame by saying "i wasn't speeding"!!!!

I think all this focus on speed limits and speed cameras and enforcement has distorted public opinion of what constitues safe driving.

Compliance with speed limits appears to be the number one road safety priority in some individual's minds; any kind of dangerous conduct on the road is absolutely fine provided its not over the speed limit.


As sad as it is I can't help but agree.......

Take note all people intending to drive home from the pub tonight - just make sure you stay within the speed limit and no-one will bat an eye lid.....Certainly no cameras will catch you.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 13:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Bit in one of the dailies to day mentions the graduated points also going up ( mentions 45 in a 30=6) .

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 13:36 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
T2006 wrote:
[I think all this focus on speed limits and speed cameras and enforcement has distorted public opinion of what constitues safe driving.

Compliance with speed limits appears to be the number one road safety priority in some individual's minds; any kind of dangerous conduct on the road is absolutely fine provided its not over the speed limit.


Woman today fined £200 for putting on makeup while driving with both hands off the wheel.
This is a fine that speeding often generates, therefore the law sees them as comparable.

If everyone were to drive like this woman then the carnage on the roads would be massive. Most people break the speed limit every day and yet only a small number of accidents are caused by breaking the speed limit.

As T2006 says she probably thought she was doing nothing wrong as she was within the speed limit.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 13:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
As T2006 says she probably thought she was doing nothing wrong as she was within the speed limit"


As i said elswhere early tv this morning featured this with experts - main focus was on speed - not that she was doinfg somthin dangerous -even had a presenter in a simulator proving it was dangerous -and a driving instructor waffling on about speed.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 23:32 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2004 15:49
Posts: 393
Quote:
As T2006 says she probably thought she was doing nothing wrong as she was within the speed limit"


She pretty much does say that -- quote from today's Sun:

"I had my make-up bag open so I reached for my beige eye-shadow and, making sure I was under the 40 mph limit, I opened it up. I had part of my left arm steering the car and holding the make-up pot."


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 00:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2005 17:56
Posts: 189
Location: Essex
Saw this article on the BBC and in particular found this bit funny:

Quote:
Research suggests such simple actions can have a serious effect on driving skills. A study for the AA found that fiddling with the car stereo caused drivers to cross lanes, go off the road, go above the speed limit and be more at risk of a collision.


I love the way they give the idea that speeding is a rare sight on our roads :? It's not as if every driver you see exceeding the speed limit is being distracted by make-up/radio tuning/mobile phone.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 16:37 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 18:38
Posts: 396
Location: Glasgow
madroaduser wrote:
Saw
Quote:
Research suggests such simple actions can have a serious effect on driving skills. A study for the AA found that fiddling with the car stereo caused drivers to cross lanes, go off the road, go above the speed limit and be more at risk of a collision.



Unbelievable! The implication from the AA (a motoring organisation with you would have hoped a bit more sense) is that going above the speed limit is as dangerous as crossing lanes or going off the road.

How many accidents caused by crossing lanes blindly - let's guess 5% of the time. For going off the road - 100%. For speeding - 0.0001%? And I have probably erred on the cautious side.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 05:11 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
jamie_duff wrote:
T2006 wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
I saw some of the debate on Parliament Tv (Freeview). Ladyman made a very interesting slip. He said they were looking at speed limit signing in camera zones "so that people would know what speed they were supposed to be driving at".

Oh yeah? So the speed limit is a target is it? Can't wait to see it in Hansard... :)


It just goes to show how warped road safety has become.

I was reading a previous post by a police officer, that stated nowdays it was common place for people involved in accidents to exonerate themselves form any blame by saying "i wasn't speeding"!!!!

I think all this focus on speed limits and speed cameras and enforcement has distorted public opinion of what constitues safe driving.

Compliance with speed limits appears to be the number one road safety priority in some individual's minds; any kind of dangerous conduct on the road is absolutely fine provided its not over the speed limit.


As sad as it is I can't help but agree.......

Take note all people intending to drive home from the pub tonight - just make sure you stay within the speed limit and no-one will bat an eye lid.....Certainly no cameras will catch you.


I know someone who is a habitual heavy drink driver. He thinks speed cameras are the best thing since sliced bread. "As long as you don't go above the speed limit, they don't care any more". Actual words.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:57 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
antera309 wrote:
I know someone who is a habitual heavy drink driver.

If his offending is both habitual and heavy, shouldn't you report him to the authorities?

It can be done anonymously via Crimestoppers.

0800 555 111

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 16:17 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
PeterE wrote:
antera309 wrote:
I know someone who is a habitual heavy drink driver.

If his offending is both habitual and heavy, shouldn't you report him to the authorities?

It can be done anonymously via Crimestoppers.


Because it would be the same as reporting a car theft or a burglary. The Police wouldn't do anything.

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 16:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
antera309 wrote:
PeterE wrote:
antera309 wrote:
I know someone who is a habitual heavy drink driver.

If his offending is both habitual and heavy, shouldn't you report him to the authorities?

It can be done anonymously via Crimestoppers.

Because it would be the same as reporting a car theft or a burglary. The Police wouldn't do anything.

I wouldn't be so sure - if you can say to them "every Saturday night, XXXX drives home from the Dog & Duck in car reg A123XYZ after consuming at least seven pints" then I would expect them to check it out. Maybe the BiBs on here could say what they would do if they received such information and had no suspicions it was a malicious hoax.

Every Christmas the police run "shop a drink driver" hotlines and claim a certain amount of success from them.

Admittedly there would need to be a habitual pattern of offending - it's unlikely you'd be able to get anyone "caught in the act".

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.016s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]