Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Jun 26, 2026 09:49

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 21:53 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Gixxer wrote:
What a complete & utter load of tosh.


That is no way to refer to your own work - have a bit of pride, man!

Gixxer wrote:
I (and many others here) do not go around exceeding posted limits whenever we feel like it, we analyse the scenario & regulate our speed accordingly.


Who in hell would break the limit when they don't feel like it!?! If you break the speed limit, you either break it when you feel like it, or you break it when you don't feel like it! There are no other options, Gixxer.

PS: I suppose you could argue that sometimes you feel like breaking the limit, but you don't break it. Could that be near camera sites, by any chance?

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:07 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
camera operator wrote:
i am getting more and more convinced that come April 2007 it will be open season to go anywhere


Might there be a ramping up of detection technology? Why do you say that, what is special about April 2007?

I've been predicting a surge in detection capability for some time. Is there any new technology that you can give us a glimpse of? Anything involving real time tracking, and cars with digital IDs? Do you have the inside guff?

That fool Clarke has finally got his ID card bill through the Lords. Do you think there will be a tightening of systems? I can update my TAX through the Internet now – my insurance is in a computer file at DVLA. My MOT certificate is online. Are these things to be tied into a tight network of information on all drivers and cars?

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:10 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Quote:
But the average punter here does want the right to drive faster than the legal limit whenever he feels like it.


No basingwerk, we would like the legal limits to be higher.

How could anyone have the "right to drive faster than the legal limit"?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:19 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
camera operator wrote:
65% in 30mph knocks brookwoods theory out then


In my area ALL speed camera sites are NSL.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:21 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Gixxer wrote:
If you honestly believe that my doing 85mph on an empty M6 toll in dry conditions & broad daylight makes me a danger because I have gone over the limit, then you show me the proof that my actions make me a danger (but we already know that isn't going to happen because you cannot possibly provide any such evidence).


You’ve got hold of the wrong end of the stick, Gixxer. There is nothing personal or special about “You” or the “M6 on a good day” in any of this.

The point is that the law says a bloke doing 85mph is just some Joe slobbing out, end of story. He can say ‘but it was clear and dry’ and ‘there was nobody about’, and what have you. But it’s just making excuses. Who knows what was going on in his head, or what the weather was like – life’s too short to deal with all that malarkey. Nobody expects to smash his or her car. They all think it’s OK when they feel like speeding.

There are lots of variables, and that is why the absolute top limit is 70, not 15 or 35 or 50 or 60. We don’t know about all those variables and stuff, so there is an absolute top limit and that’s how it is. Come on Gixxer, stop all this car crap, and take the pledge.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:24 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
camera operator wrote:
cheers
65% in 30mph knocks brookwoods theory out then

Except I can only think of one or two of these 30 limits which is justified. Most of them a 40 limit would be better suited. One of them (depending on exactally where the van sits) should probably be NSL.

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:28 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Johnnytheboy wrote:
How could anyone have the "right to drive faster than the legal limit"?


Thanks Johnnytheboy - I was waiting for something like that. It's the question that SafeSpeed has never explained. Come on SafeSpeed - try again for me and Johnnytheboy - how could anyone have the "right to drive faster than the legal limit"?

Johnnytheboy wrote:
we would like the legal limits to be higher.


At least you have a coherent position. Let's try that one on SafeSpeed as well - do you want that, SafeSpeed? Come on, out with it, man!

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:39 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
basingwerk

i am man enough to admit that the speed limits in this country need to be looked at, how it will be done i do not know, residential and NSl need to be looked at differently

as Ziltro has identified Dorest has 67% of its site in 30mph but in Ziltro's opinion they should be 40mph, no doubt some of these roads could be driven at 40mph others maybe 20mph

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:43 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
camera operator wrote:
65% in 30mph knocks brookwoods theory out then


Not really. All this tells us is that, in one county, 65% of their sites are in 30mph areas. It doesn't tell us what is going on elsewhere in the UK, NOR does it tell us what is the nature of the road being targetted - is it a wide open urban dual carriageway with an annoying low 30 limit slapped along its entire length, or is it a narrow side street with parked cars both sides, bordered on one side by a childrens playground and a school on the other, where anything much above 10-15mph would be crazy.

If you recall what Brookwood actually said (my emphasis on the latter part of the quote):

Brookwood wrote:
There are so rarely traps where the limit is 30 but most people do 20 because of the parked cars or other hazards


Which seems to reflect my experience with regards to the fixed/mobile cam sites in 30 limits around here - I can't think of ANY sites situated in places where I'd be keeping my speed well below 30 anyway due to the nature of the road, they're all located on roads where, in the absence of the camera (or once safely out of its sight) I'd naturally select a speed closer to 40 than 30... Great places to stick a camera if you're looking to catch as many average motorists as possible making safe progress, lousy places to stick a camera if you're looking to catch the genuinely dangerous drivers who would and DO opt to drive down the high hazard density roads at 30+.

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 22:49 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
camera operator wrote:
basingwerk

i am man enough to admit that the speed limits in this country need to be looked at, how it will be done i do not know, residential and NSl need to be looked at differently


Yes, I know all about that but you have to be careful what you say - give an inch and they take a mile. Any message like that is interpreted as ‘I know what I am talking about - you are OK to speed – the limits are all wrong’.

You are better off treating SafeSpeeders harshly but consistently – I know that may sound heartless, but it’s a “Tough-Love” situation.

Basically, we want less of this speeding malarkey in our towns, villages and bendy A-roads. If that means a few Clarkson-Clones get pissed off, it’s well worth it.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:01 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
basingwerk wrote:
Come on Gixxer, stop all this car crap, and take the pledge.


Listen, as you obviously feel so strongly about it, why don't you put your money where your mouth is, and as Paul did, give up your cushy job and start your own "Take the Pledge" campaign.
Let's see how many supporters you get.
Or , failing that, crawl back into the hole you came from and stop bothering us.
In case you haven't noticed, we're dealing with real life and death issues here, and your puerile 'stuck record' bleating isn't helping.

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:15 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
basingwerk wrote:
guron83 wrote:
the speed camera lobby refer to groups like ours as "pro-speed", which is obviously incorrect.


I’m very glad to hear that you are not pro-speed, and you don’t want to break the speed limit. Well done – take the pledge and drive within the limit from now on, like me.

But the average punter here does want the right to drive faster than the legal limit whenever he feels like it. That is "pro-speed" unless we split hairs about it.


Nope - we want the speed limit to reflect the road properly.

We also want the enforcement to take the whole story into account...

Had some daft woman tailgating me this morning... was on an NSL - twisty and a bad road surface.. pot holes, uneven stretches and subsidence .. even at low speed - you see cars really re-bounding badly. Thus the one NSL where you would not drive NSL ... :wink:

Woman was flashing her headlamps and driving right on my rear. Even when I was indicating my intention to turn left - she was on her horn and waving her fists around. I used the smoother road to short cut to where I wanted to go.- and a shop I needed to call at .... and pulled up behind her at some traffic lights - where the same aggression was displayed to another driver. A police officer would have nailed her. I did note that even though her driving was legal because of the guy in front and the flow .. her brake lights still came on at teh speed cam and then the aggression hit again as I observed her sit on the chap's rear...
:roll:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:20 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Pete317 wrote:
we're dealing with real life and death issues here, and your puerile 'stuck record' bleating isn't helping.


Don’t give me that old horseshit – you have decided your case first, then invented your evidence to suit it. It’s arse backwards, and you damn well know it.

I'm helping you sort out your anger management issues here. Perhaps speed cameras are just a proxy for other real problems? Maybe you and SafeSpeed have invented this “struggle” to give meaning to your lives? A sort of “Mein Kampf” for Clarkson-Clones? What a waste of time – take the pledge and join those who have stopped being selfish speed slobs.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Last edited by basingwerk on Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:25, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:21 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
basingwerk wrote:
jamie_duff wrote:
What if the Micra is doing NSL and the Jag 70mph on the NSL road? The Jag is without question still the safer place to be, but it's illegal. The law is the law - fine with that.


I'm glad that you have declared your respect for the law! Good man, take the pledge.

Now although the Jag might be safer at speed than a Nissan, it is far, far more likely to be broken down and unable to get anywhere at all!

Stats:

http://www.reliabilityindex.co.uk/man_i ... 010848601#



Ours are reliable. :wink:

So far so good... not had problems.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:24 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Mad Moggie wrote:
basingwerk wrote:

blah blah blah Jags are unreliable blah blah blah


Ours are reliable. :wink: So far so good... not had problems.


You are comparing them to a Triumph Stag, Moggie - a cardboard Trabant would be reliable in comparison to that!

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
basingwerk wrote:
Gixxer wrote:
What a complete & utter load of tosh.


That is no way to refer to your own work - have a bit of pride, man!

Gixxer wrote:
I (and many others here) do not go around exceeding posted limits whenever we feel like it, we analyse the scenario & regulate our speed accordingly.


Who in hell would break the limit when they don't feel like it!?! If you break the speed limit, you either break it when you feel like it, or you break it when you don't feel like it! There are no other options, Gixxer.

PS: I suppose you could argue that sometimes you feel like breaking the limit, but you don't break it. Could that be near camera sites, by any chance?


Thought this had already been explained to you .. people can drift over.. cambers, polish on surface .. road surface ..they may feel they are complying but be over - gradual increase - they may not discern and Lancs.. :roll: :roll: - still has a low ping tolerance...

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:39 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Mad Moggie wrote:
basingwerk wrote:
I’m very glad to hear that you are not pro-speed, and you don’t want to break the speed limit. Well done – take the pledge and drive within the limit from now on, like me.

But the average punter here does want the right to drive faster than the legal limit whenever he feels like it. That is "pro-speed" unless we split hairs about it.


Nope - we want the speed limit to reflect the road properly.


Even I can’t argue with that, although there is a dichotomy – SafeSpeed’s incoherent position is that the ‘wants the right to go faster than the legal limit’, whereas you and Johnytheboy want to have adjusted limits. Johnytheboy just want to adjust them upwards! I’m more in line with your views. The roads should have rational limits, chosen by a balance of professional opinion and political acceptability.

Mad Moggie wrote:
We also want the enforcement to take the whole story into account...


Should the message we send to young driver be “drive at a safe speed within the limit”, or “they always let you off with it anyway, so go whatever speed you want”. Think about that question Moggie. Think about what message would be sent to drivers if limits were not enforced much at all.

Mad Moggie wrote:
Woman was flashing her headlamps and driving right on my rear. Even when I was indicating my intention to turn left - she was on her horn and waving her fists around. I used the smoother road to short cut to where I wanted to go.- and a shop I needed to call at .... and pulled up behind her at some traffic lights - where the same aggression was displayed to another driver. A police officer would have nailed her.


Yes. As a “within the limits” driver, I get that now and again. In the longer term, a kind of Darwinian crash-extinction will tend to wither people with those traits out of the gene pool, but that might take centuries. It would actually happen sooner if we made cars less safe. There is a thread about it somewhere - a spike behind the wheel!

Tailgaters get a straight 5 mph penalty from me, and another one if they get closer still – it’s a sort of “Tough-Love” situation.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:47 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
Mad Moggie wrote:
basingwerk wrote:

If you break the speed limit, you either break it when you feel like it, or you break it when you don't feel like it! There are no other options, Gixxer.


.. people can drift over.. cambers, polish on surface .. road surface ..they may feel they are complying but be over - gradual increase - they may not discern and Lancs.. :roll: :roll: - still has a low ping tolerance...


Yeah, but I don’t know what’s worse – breaking the speed limit when you feel like it, or being unconscious of breaking the limit without even knowing whether you feel like it or not!?! How can you trade those choices off?

I’d rather be conscious of NOT breaking the limit whether I feel like it or not. That is the right moral and rational choice, in my view.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My view
PostPosted: Thu Mar 30, 2006 23:49 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 13:50
Posts: 2643
basingwerk wrote:
Don’t give me that old horseshit – you have decided your case first, then invented your evidence to suit it. It’s arse backwards, and you damn well know it.

I'm helping you sort out your anger management issues here. Perhaps speed cameras are just a proxy for other real problems? Maybe you and SafeSpeed have invented this “struggle” to give meaning to your lives? A sort of “Mein Kampf” for Clarkson-Clones? What a waste of time – take the pledge and join those who have stopped being selfish speed slobs.


Look here, you little squirt, one of my main motivations for being here is the memory of my mother, and the system which failed her so badly.
If you can't come here and debate the issues with proper arguments and reasoning, do us all a favour and f*** off!

_________________
Only when ideology, prejudice and dogma are set aside does the truth emerge - Kepler


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 31, 2006 00:01 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
basingwerk wrote:
Mad Moggie wrote:
basingwerk wrote:

blah blah blah Jags are unreliable blah blah blah


Ours are reliable. :wink: So far so good... not had problems.


You are comparing them to a Triumph Stag, Moggie - a cardboard Trabant would be reliable in comparison to that!


Not had any breakdowns so far.. the Stag on the other hand ... agree she has a bit of a "temper tantrum" :lol: - But usually in a traffic jam.. She gets a bit "heated and tetchy" :roll:

Besides - there is a Trabi in our collection....belongs to one of the Swiss.! Lurid shocking pink - he liked the colour... :shock:

Reliabilty? It starts... it travels forwards... it's when you try to negotiate a corner .. in fact any turn of the wheel that you realise that this car and road holding are not compatible :o :yikes: Will concede the Trabi does not overheat.. it just spluttes and putters .. :roll:


Have a post card from Leipzig "Trabis Heartbeat Song " :lol: :lol: :lol: to tune of Heartbeat.. I think. :?

postcard we bought in Leipzig last year cos it brought us in touch with our complete anorak side wrote:
"Come on - Everybody sing the Trabi song - hey nena ho - rena Trabisong"

Did you Trabi all day and all night long - hey rena ho nena Trabis Song


Look - it's wot it says on me souvenir postcard! :lol: :lol:

Quote:
[give me a "T" " T" " R" " R" " A " "A " "B" und "I" yeah!

Ich fahr Trabi ..ich fahr Trabi . Du faehrst Trabi.. Du faehrst Trabi Alle fahren Trabi Alle fahren Trabi ... la- lal da li lah ... ist gut - ja!"


Yep.... and it gets worse :shock: :shock:

Later that evening - back at the hotel... (it was an old army barracks converted into a hotel.. :shock:


Apparently the Red Army sold them back to the Germans - who made them into hotels....actually - it was rather nice and well run.. and food (home cooked was superb actually - could not fault the couple who ran it. )

Anyway - they decided to have "in-hotel" entertainment... was sort of like the Andrews sisters, Beverley sisters and Madame Edith from Allo Allo ... with songs from the 40s and 50s era... :? Wildy thought they looked like elderly girl guides :rotfl: But they actually sang this song.. ye gods! :shock:

We were in a village near Wernigerode and Quedlingburg..Places were very quaint and untouched

Hotel entertainment was surreal though... :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 66 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 94 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.017s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]