Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 07:12

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:04 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
jamie_duff wrote:
I strongly suspect that were you face to face with all the people you enjoy insulting you would be far less hasty to pass judgement on their maturity and understanding of road safety.


Yeah - its a shame you don't have an emoticon for "rasping anger", isn't it?

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:30 
Offline
Banned
Banned

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 12:47
Posts: 2291
pogo wrote:
BW, you have my every sympathy for the injuries that you received from that juvenile nutcase, but by your comments you're making Paul's point for him! ... they need stopping and nicking, there and then ...


It's good to see that you have bounced back to your normal self, pogo! It was my mate who got had his hips smashed in - I got off light with a stoved in chest. Listen, I have absolutley no problem with having more coppers to stop and nick people as long as motorists can cough up the dough to pay thier wages.

Simply stated, four cases are

Code:
good quality driving at right speed = v low danger?
good quality driving at great speed = low-med danger?
poor quality driving at right speed = medium-high danger?
poor quality driving at great speed = v high danger?


Now we have argued for a zillion years about the gradations of meaning in that table, but speed and quality are both factors, and a programme of speed limits has been laid out to deal with that. Where the limits are wrong, they should be changed, and a process should exist to make that happen. But once set, it's our duty to propagate the programme, by deeds as well as words, and this site has not done that so far. I live in hope that things will change. Once motorists in general pay heed to speed limits when the matter, we can scrap mass enforcement all together. As long as they generally pay little heed, enforcement is practically inevitable, due to politics as much a technical reasons.

_________________
I stole this .sig


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2005 09:01
Posts: 1548
jamie_duff wrote:
Basingwerk - you strike me as one of these meak people who borrows much extra courage in your convictions thanks to the protection Internet Annonimity gives you.

The internet doesn't really give anonymity Jamie, as somebody found out to their dismay earlier on this week :lol:


@BW,
I can't be bothered to start quoting, but I (and pretty much everybody else here) want to see appropiate limits being set rather than artificially low limits being imposed and then being screwed by a camera.

Coming home from Portsmouth yesterday, the legal limit for the road I was on was 70mph. However due to the amount of traffic occupying the same space at once, anything over 50mph was starting the push it.

By the same token, if that particular road had been empty then driving along at 80 or even 90mph would not have been considered out of order by anybody given that the road in question was very long, very straight, and very wide.

_________________
What makes you think I'm drunk officer, have I got a fat bird with me?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 10:48 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
basingwerk wrote:
Simply stated, four cases are

Code:
good quality driving at right speed = v low danger?
good quality driving at great speed = low-med danger?
poor quality driving at right speed = medium-high danger?
poor quality driving at great speed = v high danger?


If you use the definition of 'speed' that I think you are thinking of using, that table is UTTER rubbish.

What definition of 'speed' are you using?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 13:11 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 14:00
Posts: 1271
Location: Near Telford, UK / Barcelona, Spain
basingwerk wrote:
Simply stated, four cases are

Code:
good quality driving at right speed = v low danger?
good quality driving at great speed = low-med danger?
poor quality driving at right speed = medium-high danger?
poor quality driving at great speed = v high danger?

I think that you're wrong. Very wrong...

"Good quality driving" implies matching speed to the conditions, so, to use your example, if "good quality driving at great speed" equates to "low-med danger" it is not "good quality driving".

Equally, "poor quality driving" at any speed equates to "high danger", the only advantage to the poor quality driver of low speed is that it might reduce the impact speed of the inevitable shunt, but as the stats show, the pre-impact speed has very little to do with the outcome.

So, your table needs adjusting to:

Code:
Good quality driving at any speed = low danger
Poor quality driving at any speed = high danger.


QED.

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 13:22 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Equally, I would argue that:

Code:
right speed = f(posted speed)


...where f can be anything between about 0.25 and 3, as 'posted speed' is as prone to human interpretation as each driver's calculation of 'right speed'


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 13:27 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Drawing only the parallel of "four cases" and using the basis of the above as a hypothesis generator, how about this:
Code:
good quality driver having attempted to select/selected the right speed = v low danger?
good quality driver intentionally pushing the envelope = low-med danger?
poor quality driver having attempted to select/selected the right speed = medium-high danger?
poor quality driver intentionally pushing the envelope = v high danger?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 20:08 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 11, 2005 20:28
Posts: 1267
Location: not too far in front, not too far behind.
back on the chicanes subject ... I came home a different way tonight, through a place called Moss Bank. There is a chicane (2 actually, but one in particular) that has a bus stop slap bang in the middle of it.

Sheer madness.

_________________
COAST Not just somewhere to keep a beach.

A young loner on a crusade to champion the cause of the innocent, the helpless, the powerless, in a world of criminals who operate above the law.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 15:02 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Handy - i live in the town Terry (sorry Sir Terry)Wogan ricicules as the only town with a ring road running thtrough the centre of it -NUNEATON. On one very busy junction, we have treafficlights with a right turn, (the sensors were damaged during road works, but not replaced or repeared) -
On one junction , a few hundred yard on we have a bus stop -when the bus stops all following traffic stops too. Imagine the chaos at peak times ----traffic tailing back with bus , traffic tailing back due to faulty lights --

And the council ask why Sir Tery Takes the P

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 89 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.023s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]