Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Jun 18, 2026 09:16

View unanswered posts | View active topics


Board index » Discussion Forums » Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law

All times are UTC [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
JohnF
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 08:35 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:38
Posts: 73
Location: South Bucks
I think it was the same Neil Kinnock who once said in Parliament (of Margaret Thatcher's trade union legislation) that bad laws should be changed rather than broken.

Perhaps he would care to turn his attention to the bad laws that are currently criminalising drivers by the million, himself included, with no noticeable impact on road safety...
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
cpm
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 14:22 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 19:42
Posts: 7
HalcyonRichard wrote:
Hi Paul,
This is the high profile type of friend we need. He is ripe for the message - he knows he wasn't driving dangerously and the inconvienience of the system. ( he's a politician hence the apology and remorse and no use of hardship - no days of press hounding ). A nice letter explaining the case against speed cameras and asking for more independant research might give you a friend in high places.

Regards

Richard


That's hardly likely to happen after PS's press release of "Neil Kinnock, you are a hypocrite of the first order".

_________________
cpm
If you don't heed the sign
be prepared for a fine
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Ernest Marsh
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 20:00 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
In that case, invite him here to put his case, and defend himself.

It MIGHT just be the way the press has reported his words which make him SEEM hypocritical. 8-)

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
the sensible majority
 Post subject: court sentences
PostPosted: Fri Apr 28, 2006 22:53 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 13:06
Posts: 133
Location: chesterfield
Mr Kinnock is of orse a millionare (i wont bore you with the class poloticsof) the point is that asix month ban and £400 fine for some has a totally different effect of a six month ban and £400 fine for others.

There should be some way of making Kinnock and the one braincelled football celerbs pay a similar penalty (excuse the pun) to te rest of the population.

_________________
Why not put on speed limiters we have the technology only idiots break the speed limit
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Johnnytheboy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 08:10 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Quote:
poloticsof
:?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
pogo
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 14:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 14:00
Posts: 1271
Location: Near Telford, UK / Barcelona, Spain
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Quote:
poloticsof

Bless You!

_________________
"Politicians are the same the world over... We build bridges where there aren't any rivers." - Nikita Kruschev
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Johnnytheboy
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Apr 29, 2006 15:16 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
:rotfl: :rotfl: :rotfl:

Sorry, it's the hayfever...
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Homer
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 07:48 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2004 14:04
Posts: 2325
Location: The interweb
So it's OK as long as you take the punishment.

Can we apply this elsewhere?

Is it OK for me to murder someone "if I take the punishment"?

Kerry Gwyther, defending wrote:
He was going above the speed limit as a result of sheer inadvertence. He was travelling back from Westminster on both occasions.


So he is also guilty of driving without due care and attention?
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Gizmo
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2006 11:34 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
So if you get caught and you are a politician, of copper its "shear inadvertence"

If its joe public its "antisocial behavior".

I must remember that one.

I wonder is Prescot was guilty of "shear Inadvertence" when he was caught shagging his secretary... :lol:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
BottyBurp
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 04, 2006 13:21 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 22:47
Posts: 1511
Location: West Midlands
And taken from another thread, "The chief constable of Central Scotland has branded speeding as "the worst kind of anti social behaviour"."

_________________
Pecunia Prius Equitas et Salus
Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 2 of 2
  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » Discussion Forums » Speed, Safety, Driving and The Law

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.077s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]