Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Nov 09, 2026 13:01

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Advice please.
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 18:57 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 18:37
Posts: 4
Great site. I am new today! I have just received a letter to say I was caught doing 35mph in a 30pmh area. I recall the police van and I also recall approaching it at no more than 25mph, from a distance of about 400 yards away. Should I appeal by writing to the police or just accept it and get the points and pay the fine? Do I have a right to ask for evidence at this stage?

Thanks :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jun 15, 2006 20:15 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 00:11
Posts: 764
Location: Sofa
www.pepipoo.com is the place for this.

_________________
Less Kodak, more Kojak.
In times of deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 01:05 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
sparkle wrote:
caught doing 35mph in a 30pmh area.
I recall the police van and I also recall approaching it at no more than 25mph, from a distance of about 400 yards away.
Should I appeal by writing to the police or just accept it and get the points and pay the fine? Do I have a right to ask for evidence at this stage?
Thanks :)

Appealing to the better nature of the police is a waste of time and effort. They are just running a legalised “highway robbery” business with their laser guns, they want your money and don’t care about the penalty point you get.

First ask for evidence that it was your vehicle, that it is not mistaken identity, and you should get at least a couple of photos from the video. They may select the photos to make it look as bad as possible for you and to conceal anything in your favour. You need to see the video to find out.

Yes you should then be able to get the video under the data protection act if you accept you were the driver. PePiPoo explain about the PACE statement you may wish to consider.

From the video you might then be able to determine and prove your speed, but it will depend on the circumstances and if their are good refernce markings. It may require some geometry and maths.

You should be able to get the video and check the validity of the speeding allegation before taking the matter to court.

You could take a look at my posting at http://www.safespeed.org.uk/forum/viewt ... ght=#82975

Understand if you fight the case then you are likely to have at least six months of worry and effort ahead of you and you may not win, even if you are innocent, so it could then cost you about £400 in fines and costs. If you win you can’t claim costs for time off work to attend court. If you believe you were not speeding and think you can prove it then have a go and you will learn a lot and be better prepared for the next time. It depends how much you think your licence is worth and how many penalty points you already have.

We will give you what support we can. Can you give more information about the circumstances and let us know if you get the video, assuming it was a mobile laser camera van with an LTI 20.20.

There is a lot of stuff here on SafeSpeed and PePiPoo about the inaccuracy and unreliability of the LTI 20.20


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 16, 2006 21:08 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 18:37
Posts: 4
As my memory serves me, it was a white van with a police officer in the driving seat with a hand held speed gun. I have no points on my license to date.

Thanks so much for your advice. :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 17:24 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 25, 2004 19:19
Posts: 1050
It may well be that the officer pinged you from much further away.

In which case you need to find out how far away. Anything over 500M and you may well have a case that (and assuming he was a copper) he didn't form the prior opinion of speed before using his scamera. In such a case he would not have complied with the law and you conviction would be unsafe.

A simple test in court would be to show a video of vehicles 500m away and ask the copper to tell you if one is over a set speed limit. time how long and how far away it is.

I bet (without the assistence of a high power video camera) he can't tell you as quickly


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jun 23, 2006 17:34 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 18:37
Posts: 4
I actually spoke to someone ho I bought a new car from and he says the police just sit there zapping everyone that passes. He knew where I had been done even before I told him!!!!!!!! : :(


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 17:20 
Offline
Camera Partnership Staff
Camera Partnership Staff
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 26, 2005 19:48
Posts: 1995
sparkle wrote:
As my memory serves me, it was a white van with a police officer in the driving seat with a hand held speed gun.


are you sure he was sat in the front with the laser, the lastec system is pretty heavy to handle without a tripod ?

maybe the van was doubled crewed (wimps)

have you any photos these would clarify the distance etc

35 in a 30 intresting are you 100% it was a mobile you were caught with rather than a static

_________________
now retired


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:12 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 18:37
Posts: 4
There was def one officer in it. The radar gun thing was resting on his door with the window down. I have written to police and they say I can view the photos but I will have to go there!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:08 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
sparkle wrote:
I have written to police and they say I can view the photos but I will have to go there!

Don't fall for that, insist on them sending you the photos, if necessary use the Data Protection Act, see my previous postings on this matter.

You will need the photos to analyse them to check the validity of the speeding allegation.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 12:31 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 12:01
Posts: 4815
Location: Essex
Dr L wrote:
sparkle wrote:
I have written to police and they say I can view the photos but I will have to go there!

Don't fall for that, insist on them sending you the photos, if necessary use the Data Protection Act, see my previous postings on this matter.

You will need the photos to analyse them to check the validity of the speeding allegation.


Exactly - and that can't be done in a few seconds with a desk jockey breathing down your neck.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 14:06 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Roger wrote:
Dr L wrote:
sparkle wrote:
I have written to police and they say I can view the photos but I will have to go there!

Don't fall for that, insist on them sending you the photos, if necessary use the Data Protection Act, see my previous postings on this matter.

You will need the photos to analyse them to check the validity of the speeding allegation.


Exactly - and that can't be done in a few seconds with a desk jockey breathing down your neck.


Just to add to this, who's to say you will understand the information on the photos, tell them you need the originals to take away and have them analysed by a proffesional person who understands the information on them.

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 14:32 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2006 00:42
Posts: 832
If you miss the deadline for the Fixed Penalty Offer (FPO), but decide to accept you were speeding, you can still plead guilty at the first court hearing. This will cost more than the FPO, but not execesively so.

After the deadline for the FPO they are likely to still repeat the offer a couple of weeks later, together with some intimidation, since they would rather just get you money than go through the courts.

It will give you much more time in which to make up your mind and learn more about the system and how to deal with it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.014s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]