Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Mon Jun 22, 2026 12:31

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 11:12 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
I'm reading it now:

http://www.dft.gov.uk/stellent/groups/d ... 028073.pdf

It's been long awaited:

http://www.safespeed.org.uk/scras.html

But where on earth is all that data that they have gathered with the interim system since 1997?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 15:08 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
SafeSpeed wrote:
But where on earth is all that data that they have gathered with the interim system since 1997?

Good question. You're not suggesting that they might be hanging on to it in case it doesn't support the speed-is-to-blame-for-everything theory? Surely not. :wink: If it's never released it'll be interesting to hear the explanation. Possibly something on lines of the data captured doesn't fit in with their new STATS19 form I expect.

From section 3.6.1 of the review.
Quote:
The single factor explicitly relating to speed in the TRL devised National System is 'Excessive speed'. One of the results from the survey of data providers and users as part of the '2002 Quality Review of STATS19' was that this gave insufficient weight to the problems associated with speeding, and that an additional factor should be included for 'Inappropriate speed' to supplement the existing factor.

Is this good news or bad news? Maybe it's good that they're going to differentiate between excessive speed and illegal speed, and there'll be proof that there's plenty of accidents that speed cameras can't possibly catch. On the other hand the phrase insufficient weight to the problems associated with speeding makes me wonder if there's still an agenda being pursued here.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 01, 2004 15:58 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 00:24
Posts: 2400
Location: Kendal, Cumbria
The cynic in me does wonder whether we will end up with a form that includes boxes to tick for "excessive speed" and also for "speed in excess of the limit", and therefore any accident involving speeding might get counted twice...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 11:15 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 15:43
Posts: 2416
It does have both. Whether it gets misused I suppose will depend on if the officers that are actually going to use it get leant on by Chief Constables and scamera partnerships.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 21:29 
Offline
New User
New User

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 09:19
Posts: 1
Location: North West
The problem I can see with this is that the police will be leant on to mark speed in excess of the limit as a contributory factor for any accident that involves a car breaking the speed limit, even if the speed of the car was completely irrelevant.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 02, 2004 22:38 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
d-man wrote:
The problem I can see with this is that the police will be leant on to mark speed in excess of the limit as a contributory factor for any accident that involves a car breaking the speed limit, even if the speed of the car was completely irrelevant.


That is nothing new - they do that already. :roll:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2004 12:35 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Mon Mar 15, 2004 16:02
Posts: 372
And they'll keep on adding factors in until the 'speed related' element reaches one third..

:roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 06, 2004 13:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 08:23
Posts: 12
Insurance companies also ask witnesses explicitly if they think cars were going too fast. I said 'no' for the one where a car started braking too late to avoid a stationary vehicle in the middle of the road...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.021s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]