Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Nov 09, 2025 16:00

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 21:41 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
shaky wrote:
Surely all must agree that EVERYBODY should have basic motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued..

Nope, don't agree. Hugely impractical for many, and at best of only marginal benefit, given that motorways are already by far the safest roads.

What I would like to see is something like the Pass Plus course made mandatory and to include motorways or similar high speed roads if they exist in the locality.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 21:52 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
PeterE wrote:
shaky wrote:
Surely all must agree that EVERYBODY should have basic motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued..

Nope, don't agree. Hugely impractical for many, and at best of only marginal benefit, given that motorways are already by far the safest roads.


Why is it impractical, just because there may not be a motorway in your vicinity doesn't mean your never going to drive on one..

Quote:
What I would like to see is something like the Pass Plus course made mandatory and to include motorways or similar high speed roads if they exist in the locality.


Whats the difference???

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:13 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
PeterE wrote:
shaky wrote:
Surely all must agree that EVERYBODY should have basic motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued..

Nope, don't agree. Hugely impractical for many, and at best of only marginal benefit, given that motorways are already by far the safest roads.

What I would like to see is something like the Pass Plus course made mandatory and to include motorways or similar high speed roads if they exist in the locality.

I already posted, I think in this thread, that a compromise can be reached, much like what we already have with manual/automatic licences - one can choose the limit of entitlement and can 'upgrade' later if desired.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
smeggy wrote:
PeterE wrote:
shaky wrote:
Surely all must agree that EVERYBODY should have basic motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued..

Nope, don't agree. Hugely impractical for many, and at best of only marginal benefit, given that motorways are already by far the safest roads.

What I would like to see is something like the Pass Plus course made mandatory and to include motorways or similar high speed roads if they exist in the locality.

I already posted, I think in this thread, that a compromise can be reached, much like what we already have with manual/automatic licences - one can choose the limit of entitlement and can 'upgrade' later if desired.


Good idea, but open to abuse.. My feeling is to eliminate the risk and make everybody do it regardless..

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:44 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
shaky wrote:
PeterE wrote:
shaky wrote:
Surely all must agree that EVERYBODY should have basic motorway tuition before the magic ticket is issued..

Nope, don't agree. Hugely impractical for many, and at best of only marginal benefit, given that motorways are already by far the safest roads.

Why is it impractical, just because there may not be a motorway in your vicinity doesn't mean your never going to drive on one...

So you live in Stornoway, you have to fly to Glasgow and probably stay overnight to get your motorway tuition. Very expensive, hugely unpopular, hugely impractical.

Maybe drivers in central London should have to get tuition on single-track unfenced roads in case they ever need to drive on them.

shaky wrote:
PeterE wrote:
What I would like to see is something like the Pass Plus course made mandatory and to include motorways or similar high speed roads if they exist in the locality.

Whats the difference???

Er, firstly that it is something that happens after the L-test, and secondly that you are only tested on roads that exist in your locality.

This in itself would sweep up over 90% of the driving population - why make the remainder suffer for a relatively marginal benefit. I suspect very few of your problems on the motorway are caused by people who learned to drive in Truro or Inverness.

I fully support the principle of improved training but we need to be realistic rather than dogmatic about it.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:46 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
shaky wrote:
I just don't think it's right or fair that the many should have to keep putting up with the errors of the few.


Probably not - but it's always going to be that way. As we said before there will always be prats.

So despite the fact that it isn't right or fair, it's life.

But good policy can reduce the numbers.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:48 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
SafeSpeed wrote:
But good policy can reduce the numbers.

Yes, the key point about policy is which direction it's pushing things in.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:52 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
PeterE wrote:
I fully support the principle of improved training but we need to be realistic rather than dogmatic about it.


:clap:

Plus there's a lot of 'training' that isn't training at all. Information, beliefs, attitudes, culture, experience. These are the factors that gave us the safest roads, not a harder driving test.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 07, 2006 22:58 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
PeterE wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
But good policy can reduce the numbers.

Yes, the key point about policy is which direction it's pushing things in.


Absolutely, and present policy is shifting driver quality in the wrong direction.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 00:21 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2004 18:42
Posts: 1283
Location: Essex
Rixxy & Shaky, sorry, I should have said when I passed my test, have been driving 5 1/2 years now :oops:

Since passing I've averaged 60K, (this year's been quiet) driving from site to site, did my IAM about 3 years ago and did the Police Class 1 training (but failed :cry: ).

_________________
Gordon Brown saying I got the country into it's current economic mess so I'll get us out of it is the same as Bomber Harris nipping over to Dresden and offering to repair a few windows.

Chaos, panic and disorder - my work here is done.

http://www.wildcrafts.co.uk


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 06:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 05:00
Posts: 12
One day people will stop making excuses for the bad apples out there and something will get done about them. All I see here are certain members trying to promote their ability to drive defensively to the extreme. Would you be willing to put yourself into a barrier at 70mph to avoid mr prat?

We all, or most of us, read the road and try wherever possible to neutralise bad driving before it has an effect but doing this does not make mr prat see the error of his ways or indeed learn from the experience. No I'm not saying put a trailer over him in order to scare him to death but he must be made aware of his bad driving in some way or form, preferably by a police officer or better trained Traffic muppet.

I think cameras on slip roads would work as they could be played back and where an instance of bad driving, that was considered to be very dangerous, has occured a copy of the video along with a £500 thud through the letter box would certainly help kick the brain into gear. That or an opportunity to go on a day course in driving skills.

I know cetain people will say I'm wrong yet again but what makes them right? As I've said before, I live on these roads and have to tolerate the "I cann't wait" mob on a daily basis. If you think I'm wrong then come up with a workable solution other than sodding defensive driving.

If all drivers drove according to the highway code then we would not need so called "defensive driving" so please don't give it as an option as that would be like sticking up for the tit who beat up your mum simply because someone locked him in a wheelie bin as a baby so it's not his fault. If your mum had read the situation and kept out of his way then it wouldn't have happened. BO**OCKS!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 07:06 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 13, 2004 18:41
Posts: 893
PeterE wrote:
Maybe drivers in central London should have to get tuition on single-track unfenced roads in case they ever need to drive on them.

Why stop there? The single-track roads in Cornwall have Cornish Banks that are almost unique to Cornwall and require observation techniques peculiar to that part of the country (which is sadly lacking in the plague of emetts that descend on the county each summer). IMO, this requires considerably more skill than motorways. If this idea that you have to have tuition on every type of road that you might encounter is implemented, everyone will be obliged to train on Cornish roads before they can have their license. The again, no doubt Highlands roads have their unique features that the novice driver should learn before obtaining a license.

:twisted:

(Edited to correct tpyo!)

_________________
Will


Last edited by willcove on Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:30, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:16 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
_BOSS_ wrote:
I know cetain people will say I'm wrong yet again but what makes them right? As I've said before, I live on these roads and have to tolerate the "I cann't wait" mob on a daily basis. If you think I'm wrong then come up with a workable solution other than sodding defensive driving.

I campaign full time for improved road safety, mainly through improved driver quality fostered by appropriate policy. Heavy penalties are appropriate for those with dangerous attitudes, but many of the problems are caused by a skills shortfall, and these are better addressed with remedial training. If the training doesn't work, then let's get 'em banned in the public interest.

But when I'm driving, I'm not campaigning or educating. I'm doing everything I can to keep myself, my passengers and those around me safe.

There's absolutely nothing you can do to improve others' driving standards by the way you drive.

_BOSS_ wrote:
If all drivers drove according to the highway code then we would not need so called "defensive driving" so please don't give it as an option as that would be like sticking up for the tit who beat up your mum simply because someone locked him in a wheelie bin as a baby so it's not his fault. If your mum had read the situation and kept out of his way then it wouldn't have happened. BO**OCKS!

Can you really imagine a time when drivers are all perfect? It's like saying 'cure all diseases', or 'food should be free' or something. It might be nice, but it ain't going to happen.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:20 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
Most of you are missing my point completely....

I have agreed countless times that Mr Prat exists and that we need to deal with him in a multitude of different ways..

All i am suggesting here is that the numbers of Mr Prat can be reduced, by creating better training, clearer rules and guidlines, backed up by greater enforcement.

It would appear that most of you are content with making allowances and putting up with these morons, whilst I have very little choice, I have to put up and contend with them, but at the same time I am actively trying to build plans and offer suggestions to lesson the problem.

When your trundling down the road with 44ton on your back evasive action is NOT just a case of dabbing either pedal and slowing down and/or switching lane, It takes massive planning, and a lot of time.
Ask ANY lorry driver how much of a problem these people present, and gauge there response.

We spend all day everyday driving for other people, constantly aware that Mr Dickead could emerge from anywhere, It gets tiring and frustrating when you do it all year round....

_________________
Dave


Last edited by shaky on Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:47, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
shaky wrote:
It would appear that most of you are content with making allowances and putting up with these morons, whilst I have very little choice, I have to put up and contend with them, but at the same time I am actively trying to build plans and offer suggestions to lesson the problem.


That's rather a bizarre suggestion to make on the website forums of a road safety campaign. Most of us are here because we want better road safety policy.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:46 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
SafeSpeed wrote:
shaky wrote:
It would appear that most of you are content with making allowances and putting up with these morons, whilst I have very little choice, I have to put up and contend with them, but at the same time I am actively trying to build plans and offer suggestions to lesson the problem.


That's rather a bizarre suggestion to make on the website forums of a road safety campaign. Most of us are here because we want better road safety policy.


Then whats your suggestions and proposals for this..

I've told you some of my own idea's, but they seem to be met with an air of negativity, don't get me wrong i'm not saying my plans are best and you should all fall in line and agree, but alternative offerings seem thin on the ground..
I'm all for alternative plans and suggestions, and agree with Peter E, they do need to be practical and not dogmatic.
But most of the replies seem to offer the same advice, these people are there so just accept it and deal with it..
Which is exactly what i am doing, everyday.

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:56 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
shaky wrote:
Then whats your suggestions and proposals for this..


There's a published manifesto: http://www.safespeed.org.uk/manifesto.html

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:15 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
shaky wrote:
We spend all day everyday driving for other people, constantly aware that Mr Dickead could emerge from anywhere, It gets tiring and frustrating when you do it all year round....


Hi again mate,

I think the problem of Mr/Miss Dickhead lies in the fact that most of them pass their test in a small car and then go on to drive only cars without taking to the wheel of a truck, a motorcycle or anything else for the matter. Look what happens when Tarquin the solicitor (usual drive -BMW 5 series) hires a Luton Van for the weekend and takes 93 attempts to reverse it into a parking space :shock: (Broad stereotype noted and acknowledged :wink: )
Furthermore, I've never driven an HGV myself but, as a engineer who is mechanicaly minded I am aware of the concepts of mass, braking force, maneouvrability etc etc. I suggest that a great many Mr Dickheads or Cheryls the hairdresser (the sort of people who call out engineers to replace blown fuses or broken drive belts in their hoover :roll: ) are not and therefore have the first clue about the capabilities of your wagon and the problems their driving can cause.
So, perhaps a starting point would be a campaign to make drivers of small vehicles aware of the problems that they pose to HGV drivers, problems that could be overcome with a little thought and forward planning on their part.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:22 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
PeterE wrote:
So you live in Stornoway, you have to fly to Glasgow and probably stay overnight to get your motorway tuition. Very expensive, hugely unpopular, hugely impractical.


What about using a suitable DC instead. There are plenty of these that are almost motorways without a hard shoulder. That would capture more of the population wouldn't it?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:26 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
SafeSpeed wrote:
shaky wrote:
Then whats your suggestions and proposals for this..


There's a published manifesto: http://www.safespeed.org.uk/manifesto.html


Very good manifesto, not in agreement with all of it, but definatly most of it.

May i suggest for your HGV40 program that you look at following the same lines that we have already proposed to Government - Dual signs..

To be truthful, judging by your manifesto, we're not all that far apart in our ideals.
You have outlined a great deal of things that i have already been saying, such as for example, Restore the levels and effectiveness of traffic police.
Something i have been saying for a long time, and again something we have already made proposals to Government with.
Our own Lobby team failed to see the point of the Highway Officers, a lot of the duties that they should be doing they are unable to do without the presence of a Police Officer, so in my opinion they are under utilised, leaving us with a service of which we're paying for, that is of VERY little use.

We could go on arguing the toss from here to eternity, but after reading your manifesto there seems very little point, i would conclude that we mostly want the same things, but have different methods of achieving them.
I will admit that the emphasis of our own campaign is orientated around the truck, as there are great many other problems that are only relevent to our industry.
For those that no nothing of the transport industry you will find it difficult to understand why a lot of lorry drivers feel hard done by and UN-respected, but i guess this is a different topic altogether..

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.060s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]