Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun Nov 09, 2025 15:56

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:37 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
Rigpig wrote:
shaky wrote:
We spend all day everyday driving for other people, constantly aware that Mr Dickead could emerge from anywhere, It gets tiring and frustrating when you do it all year round....


Hi again mate,

I think the problem of Mr/Miss Dickhead lies in the fact that most of them pass their test in a small car and then go on to drive only cars without taking to the wheel of a truck, a motorcycle or anything else for the matter. Look what happens when Tarquin the solicitor (usual drive -BMW 5 series) hires a Luton Van for the weekend and takes 93 attempts to reverse it into a parking space :shock: (Broad stereotype noted and acknowledged :wink: )
Furthermore, I've never driven an HGV myself but, as a engineer who is mechanicaly minded I am aware of the concepts of mass, braking force, maneouvrability etc etc. I suggest that a great many Mr Dickheads or Cheryls the hairdresser (the sort of people who call out engineers to replace blown fuses or broken drive belts in their hoover :roll: ) are not and therefore have the first clue about the capabilities of your wagon and the problems their driving can cause.
So, perhaps a starting point would be a campaign to make drivers of small vehicles aware of the problems that they pose to HGV drivers, problems that could be overcome with a little thought and forward planning on their part.


Rigpig,

Again your making a lot of sense, and i thankyou for realising the differences involved with driving bigger, heavier vehicles.

Again our campaign has addressed this issue with Government by asking for a greater awareness to be taught to new drivers regarding HGV's, backed up with the inclusion of a seperate section within the Highway Code.

There are vast differences in vehicle characteristics, and everybody should at least have an incling as to what they are.
The objective of my own personal view is to educate rather than chastise, road safety is paramount for drivers of ANY vehicle, as our lives in the job we do is dependant on it...

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:42 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Thanks for the positive comments.

shaky wrote:
May i suggest for your HGV40 program that you look at following the same lines that we have already proposed to Government - Dual signs..


What good are dual signs? I can't see it; please explain or point me at a document.

But answer these:

- Was HGV40 a problem 5 years ago?
- What's changed?
- Why not put it back like is was before the problem?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 11:52 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
shaky wrote:
...that we have already proposed to Government...

Our own Lobby team...


Who's the 'we' shaky?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:03 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
_BOSS_ wrote:
One day people will stop making excuses for the bad apples out there and something will get done about them.

But as ordinary people, there’s nothing we can do directly as we are not seen as having authority or the ability. No-one can be judged by just one peer.

_BOSS_ wrote:
I think cameras on slip roads would work as they could be played back and where an instance of bad driving, that was considered to be very dangerous, has occured a copy of the video along with a £500 thud through the letter box would certainly help kick the brain into gear.

Because of today’s policy of banning learners from such roads, and not encouraging taking the missed tuition once drivers get their full licence, almost all drivers have no professional tuition of how to correctly/safely use such roads; hence slip road cameras punishing incorrect manoeuvres could be seen to be terribly unfair. We really do need broader tuition to learners, even if only to give a grasp of what is expected.

_BOSS_ wrote:
If all drivers drove according to the highway code then we would not need so called "defensive driving"

A particular aspect of the highway code is being abused for the interests of a few but at the detriment of many. The HC is a good guide but its effectiveness is being gradually eroded.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:04 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
shaky wrote:
smeggy wrote:
I already posted, I think in this thread, that a compromise can be reached, much like what we already have with manual/automatic licences - one can choose the limit of entitlement and can 'upgrade' later if desired.


Good idea, but open to abuse.. My feeling is to eliminate the risk and make everybody do it regardless..

I agree it could be open to abuse, but enforcement on motorways using ANPR cameras (and a decent database :roll: ) would solve a great amount of that problem. There’s no need to make motorway tuition mandatory for all drivers, but make no mistake - we have to do something and it has to be fair.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:07 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
SafeSpeed wrote:
Thanks for the positive comments.

shaky wrote:
May i suggest for your HGV40 program that you look at following the same lines that we have already proposed to Government - Dual signs..


What good are dual signs? I can't see it; please explain or point me at a document.


A massive amount of drivers are unaware of the 40mph limit imposed on HGV's, and even if we were successful in raising it to 50mph which is our aim, there would still be a 10mph difference to that of lighter traffic.
Our Idea is to have dual signs displaying the limits to each catagory..

Quote:
But answer these:

- Was HGV40 a problem 5 years ago?


Yes

Quote:
- What's changed?


It's getting worse, no doubt due to more traffic and stricter enforcment by camera vans.

Quote:
- Why not put it back like is was before the problem?


No good, the limit in our opinion needs to be raised, some drivers have the the ruling enforced upon them by company policy. I.e Tesco for example discipline there drivers caught breaking the 40 limit, and check tachograph charts to find offenders..

The we is Truckersworld Drivers Lobby Group..

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:11 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
smeggy wrote:
shaky wrote:
smeggy wrote:
I already posted, I think in this thread, that a compromise can be reached, much like what we already have with manual/automatic licences - one can choose the limit of entitlement and can 'upgrade' later if desired.


Good idea, but open to abuse.. My feeling is to eliminate the risk and make everybody do it regardless..

I agree it could be open to abuse, but enforcement on motorways using ANPR cameras (and a decent database :roll: ) would solve a great amount of that problem. There’s no need to make motorway tuition mandatory for all drivers, but make no mistake - we have to do something and it has to be fair.


Eh? Are we going to register as sole drivers of particular vehicles?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:24 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
shaky wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
shaky wrote:
May i suggest for your HGV40 program that you look at following the same lines that we have already proposed to Government - Dual signs..


What good are dual signs? I can't see it; please explain or point me at a document.


A massive amount of drivers are unaware of the 40mph limit imposed on HGV's, and even if we were successful in raising it to 50mph which is our aim, there would still be a 10mph difference to that of lighter traffic.
Our Idea is to have dual signs displaying the limits to each catagory..


Such signs could reduce animosity between car drivers and HGVs, but would (once installed) make the silly limit much harder to get changed.

And I don't believe that they would address the potential for dangerous overtaking.

And they certainly wouldn't stop skilled drivers from being prosecuted for driving safely.

shaky wrote:
The we is Truckersworld Drivers Lobby Group..


Can you put me in touch with the 'policy' person or group please?

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:30 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Jul 01, 2006 18:47
Posts: 31
See your pm's..

_________________
Dave


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 12:59 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
SafeSpeed wrote:
smeggy wrote:
I agree it could be open to abuse, but enforcement on motorways using ANPR cameras (and a decent database :roll: ) would solve a great amount of that problem. There’s no need to make motorway tuition mandatory for all drivers, but make no mistake - we have to do something and it has to be fair.


Eh? Are we going to register as sole drivers of particular vehicles?

Of course not. I’ve already admitted that it’s open to abuse but I reckon it would discourage 90% of the opportunists from using motorways without the appropriate tuition. ‘that car doesn’t have anyone insured on it with a motorway licence - pull it’. I realise your misgivings about ANPR and I know the system isn’t perfect (and that it can be so easily circumvented) but I believe it’s the fairest overall compromise.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 13:53 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
smeggy wrote:
I’ve already admitted that it’s open to abuse but I reckon it would discourage 90% of the opportunists from using motorways without the appropriate tuition. ‘that car doesn’t have anyone insured on it with a motorway licence - pull it’.


Unfortunately it wouldn't be practical with the huge numbers of cars that are on fleet/trade/3rd party extension cover.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Jul 08, 2006 15:03 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Capri2.8i wrote:
smeggy wrote:
I’ve already admitted that it’s open to abuse but I reckon it would discourage 90% of the opportunists from using motorways without the appropriate tuition. ‘that car doesn’t have anyone insured on it with a motorway licence - pull it’.


Unfortunately it wouldn't be practical with the huge numbers of cars that are on fleet/trade/3rd party extension cover.

Good points. Here are my (brainstorming) thoughts:

Fleet: any respectable company whose drivers could be expected to use a motorway could demand that that drivers have a ‘full licence’; this could be policed to some extent (the company I work for would definitely demand this).

Trade/3rd party extension: if one driver needs to have a full licence, then chances are that the other named drivers will desire/need one too. Insurance companies can force this, or hike the premium recognising the risk of a named driver with a partial licence using the motorway (edit: what I meant to say was reduce the premium for everyone else :) ), thereby discouraging abuse.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jul 09, 2006 05:56 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Jun 29, 2006 18:27
Posts: 28
Location: Manitoba
fnegroni wrote:
P.S.
The more driving experience you have, the less you brag about it...


Just for the record, I do not brag. I have no need. Were I bragging, I would have started out giving my experience. Read your first couple of replies and you will maybe see why I got irritated. I just arrived home having covered 4200 miles in a week. Tarp loads both ways. No accidents or troubles. Major city traffic too. As I say, I have no need to brag. I just thought you should know that I am not a novice.
Neither did I get personal in the first place. I don't know you and doubt I ever will. I'm sure you are a hell of a fellow, but I imagine we would disagree on things if we did know each other the same as anyone else.
You siad those silly things about the speed at which you joined the motorway. I didn't suggest it to you or anyone else.
The main point to my reply to you was this. If you join at 80 mph, and there are trucks ahead and behind, then how are you able to see that some muppet isn't passing the truck at 100+ mph? How can you tell that it is safe?
Motorways are near enough to racetracks as it is. Why try to suggest that they be treated as pit lanes? Remember Ayrton Senna?



Next thing. The dual signs work quite well. There are some European countries use them and they are fairly common in the States. They make the situation clear to all.

_________________
Once a Cornishman, always a Cornishman


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.057s | 12 Queries | GZIP : Off ]