Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sat Aug 29, 2026 09:03

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: VAS put to good use!
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 13:15 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2005 08:22
Posts: 2618
I drove down to Warminster from Swindon on saturday along the B roads. I can't remember exactly where we were, but I saw a VAS that was actually really useful. There were actually a pair about 200 yards apart at eather end of a stretch of very narrow road (wide enough to pass another car but too windy to see anything bigger). They detected a vehicle entering the restricted area and warned oncoming traffic of its presence. I was really impressed!

_________________
Science won over religion when they started installing lightning rods on churches.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 13:45 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
It does sound like a good idea in principle, and as someone who's in favour of well thought-out VAS installations this one almost gets my vote. The only snag is...


...what happens when the signs have been up for a while and people get used to being forewarned about the presence of an oncoming vehicle, and then one day they head down the road when the signs are out of order? Are we risking exchanging one risk (the present lack of awareness of the narrow lane) with another (the future assumption that if the sign isn't lit, the road ahead must be clear)?

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 14:47 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 22:02
Posts: 3266
I found a useful one near to Didcot in Oxfordshire, It flashed up to say that there was a crossroads ahead. (triangular sign) minor road crossing the one that I was on.

_________________
Speed limit sign radio interview. TV Snap Unhappy
“It has never been the rule in this country – I hope it never will be - that suspected criminal offences must automatically be the subject of prosecution” He added that there should be a prosecution: “wherever it appears that the offence or the circumstances of its commission is or are of such a character that a prosecution in respect thereof is required in the public interest”
This approach has been endorsed by Attorney General ever since 1951. CPS Code


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 00:16 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 10:44
Posts: 98
Location: Wokingham, Berkshire
Twister wrote:
It does sound like a good idea in principle, and as someone who's in favour of well thought-out VAS installations this one almost gets my vote. The only snag is...


...what happens when the signs have been up for a while and people get used to being forewarned about the presence of an oncoming vehicle, and then one day they head down the road when the signs are out of order? Are we risking exchanging one risk (the present lack of awareness of the narrow lane) with another (the future assumption that if the sign isn't lit, the road ahead must be clear)?


I think the positives outweigh the negatives in this case.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 18:43 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Twister wrote:
...what happens when the signs have been up for a while and people get used to being forewarned about the presence of an oncoming vehicle, and then one day they head down the road when the signs are out of order? Are we risking exchanging one risk (the present lack of awareness of the narrow lane) with another (the future assumption that if the sign isn't lit, the road ahead must be clear)?


The solution to this is to have it display a different message when the road is clear, rather than no message at all.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 18:54 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Lum wrote:
Twister wrote:
...what happens when the signs have been up for a while and people get used to being forewarned about the presence of an oncoming vehicle, and then one day they head down the road when the signs are out of order? Are we risking exchanging one risk (the present lack of awareness of the narrow lane) with another (the future assumption that if the sign isn't lit, the road ahead must be clear)?


The solution to this is to have it display a different message when the road is clear, rather than no message at all.


How about "Have a nice day" with a big smiley face :?:

Or....perhaps not.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 19:01 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
No because a big smiley face means you're travelling below the speed limit :)


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 19:15 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 20, 2004 09:59
Posts: 3544
Location: Shropshire
Lum wrote:
No because a big smiley face means you're travelling below the speed limit :)


It could be lulling you into a sense of false security viz...
"Welcome to our honey-trap sucker", with a scamera van lurking round the corner.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:48 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2004 11:05
Posts: 1044
Location: Hillingdon
Lum wrote:
The solution to this is to have it display a different message when the road is clear, rather than no message at all.


You'd also need a fail-safe way of detecting the correct operation of the vehicle sensors, so that the "road clear" message could *only* be displayed if the road actually was clear and not occupied by a vehicle which the sensor, for whatever reason, failed to detect. On top of that, if the sensors were proved to be working ok, you'd then also need to prove the sign was displaying the correct message for the sensor inputs received - you don't want a sticking relay, blown triac or whatever being responsible for the last message being held on the sign after the control box has asked for it to be changed...

_________________
Chris


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Jul 21, 2006 13:40 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
Well there's only so much you can do with sensors, unfortunately.

It's the exact same problem as car ECUs have, sensors fail, but they do so in such a way that they're still in range so are not detected as failure. The MAF and Lambda sensors are the ones that do that on my car and result in the engine running like a bag of crap.

I don't think anyone's found a solution to failing sensors yet, apart from regular inspection/replacement. Which should be a lot easier in this situation than on a car.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 647 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.051s | 13 Queries | GZIP : Off ]