basingwerk wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
basingwerk wrote:
When we strip away the cruft, those things simply mean "hope for the best but prepare for the worst".
No. Not at all. Those subconsciously applied behaviours are the essence of road safety in practice.
If you must be disagreeable, please try to explain how preparing only for
the best helps roads safety in any way! But now you have brought these
things up, you should know that almost every page of the Highway Code
contains information on “visual search”, “anticipation”, “hazard perception”
and “risk assessment”. Have you read it? If you have bothered, you
would know that the whole book is mostly about “risk”, so why are you not
100% behind it? Odd that, for safety campaigner, isn’t it? It may explain
why “Brake” don’t bother with SafeSpeed.
Basingwerk Liebchen
Entire family are Ex Brake members. We were "founder members" - family had much in common after all.
If you read carefully - Brake pour scorn on training intiatives.. rant on about lowering speed limits.
The
only thing we will support Brake on concerns fatigue, drink/drugs/prescription drugs und quality garage repairs (their initial raison d'etre)
Most on this site quote und refer to the Highway Code. You, as I recall, seem to advocate dealing with a road raging tailgater by way of brake testing.

You create a COAST space und remain calm. You allow the overtake - their licence if Gatso/van around ... not yours .. und if you provoke or exacerbate problem. you are also guilty of road rage und leaving yourself open to prosecution for inconsiderate driving
Quote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
If you took away all the restrictions instead, the vast majority of responsible people would drive more or less exactly as they do now.
Yeah, the Brits are so nice, maybe they don’t need any rules, like in a
fairy land. Try it in another country first, and let us know, yeah?
Foreign KSI rates are worse - a lot worse even in Swiss Alps
Quote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
More emphasis on rules frequently means less emphasis on individual skills and responsibilities.
Not at all. If obeying the highway code conflicts badly with individual skills
and responsibilities, the code
must be changed. What changes should
be made?
Highway Code ist basically a set of good practice. Some legal - but most ist "should" und not "must with reference to Road Traffic Act"
Even aggressive so-called "lawyer" on cycling forum posted this in retaliation to law abiding member of Swiss feline family .. purrrrr , claws.. miaow. purrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
