Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 22:56

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 23:27 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Lum wrote:
How about a fixed formula, 1 second for every 10mph or the like?

Ok that assumes that the speed limit is set correctly so no-one will be exceeding it, but it'll at least give you a fighting chance in 70s.

I would be very wary of calling for no traffic lights above 40mph. They will find it easier to lower the limit than to re-engineer the junction.


If you are perfectly on the ball (0.75 seconds reaction), and you don't plan to do full panic braking, but allow yourself firm braking at 0.45g the MAXIMUM safe approach speed to a set of traffic lights that may change to red with a standard 3 second amber is 44mph.

So a reduced speed limit where there are traffic lights is sensible. Putting traffic lights on 'fast roads' in NOT sensible.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 16, 2006 23:56 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
SS is right - it HAS come up before, but the fact remains that there ARE roads with 60mph speed limits that have traffic lights.

And Lum - I know that A580 road quite well. It is as you described, and a friend of mine who lives not too far from it tells me that it's one of the most dangerous roads in the country - possibly for the reasons being discussed.


Last edited by DieselMoment on Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:18, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 00:29 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Lum wrote:

I also think the green->amber->red stage needs a little work too. Currently it is 3 seconds on all roads. I think it should increase on higher limit roads. Has anyone here ever driven on the A570 East Lancashire Road? It's a very long 70mph straight, and if you stick to 70 there are plenty of times where if the lights are to change to amber you will not be able to stop before the stop line, but will not reach the stopline before they go red.


Yes - There are red light cams on some of these lights on the A580. Think the worst one is at Ather Leigh Way. Cycle is way to short. Changes before a car clears (or it did the last time I drove that way about a year ago now.) My sisters live in the Worsley area - they know that road very well and are always telling me that the traffic lights along the set from what they call "Critchley's Corner to The Common" are "lethally" short and have a camera and all still have fatal pedestrian collisions as well. Have checked it out - floral tributes at alll three lights within a mile of each other.

Road also suffers from subsidence (was a mining area) as it runs westwards in direction of St Helens.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:16 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
Mad Mog! You're right ^ it's the A580, not the A570. I'm sure we're talking about the same road. I've edited my post.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:19 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
DieselMoment wrote:
I went to edit my post but couldn't see a way of doing it.


Press the button marked edit! Top right of each message you posted. You do need to be logged on for the system to be able to associate you with your posts and make the button appear.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 17, 2006 10:28 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
Thanks SS! For some reason, the edit button wasn't being displayed - done now.

Back on topic, in parts of Spain, the change from GREEN to RED involved the green and yellow lights being on together, followed by red. So, you had the yellow telling you to stop if you could, but the green telling you to go... I think this has been changed now. I've not noticed this combination in more recent visits to Spain.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 09:51 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2006 22:08
Posts: 11
There must surely be a warning that there are traffic lights ahead on the A580..?

_________________
The light at the end of the tunnel is the light of an oncoming train..


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 10:37 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 13:41
Posts: 514
Location: Thames Valley
Badgerman wrote:
There must surely be a warning that there are traffic lights ahead on the A580..?

I'm sure there are, but that's beside the point. The point is that at 60mph, which I believe is the limit on the A580, a vehicle covers 264ft/sec and the stopping distance from 60 is given as 240ft in the Highway Code, assuming ideal conditions, ie dry road, daylight, alert driver. In less than ideal conditions, at night on a damp road with a tired driver, a car might be three seconds away from the traffic light (eg. 270-280ft) but still be unable to stop before the light changes to red.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 11:10 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
DieselMoment wrote:
Badgerman wrote:
There must surely be a warning that there are traffic lights ahead on the A580..?

I'm sure there are, but that's beside the point. The point is that at 60mph, which I believe is the limit on the A580, a vehicle covers 264ft/sec and the stopping distance from 60 is given as 240ft in the Highway Code, assuming ideal conditions, ie dry road, daylight, alert driver. In less than ideal conditions, at night on a damp road with a tired driver, a car might be three seconds away from the traffic light (eg. 270-280ft) but still be unable to stop before the light changes to red.


That's 60mph = 264 feet in THREE seconds.

Comfortable braking (0.45g) from 60mph, including 0.75 seconds thinking time gives an overall stopping distance of 333 feet.

We can do a full emergency stop in good conditions (0.9g) and expect to stop from 60mph in 200 feet overall, but who wants to emergency stop for a traffic light? And even more to the point, if conditions are less than ideal - and it only takes a wet road or a downhill slope - it will become impossible to stop from 60mph in the distance available.

Braking distance calculator spreadsheet available from http://www.safespeed.org.uk/braking.html

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 16:05 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Thu May 19, 2005 22:21
Posts: 925
DieselMoment wrote:
The point is that at 60mph, which I believe is the limit on the A580,


It varies, but certain sections of it are NSL/70mph for cars. Its more commonly referred to as the "East Lancs" road.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 16:26 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 00:01
Posts: 2258
Location: South Wales
In my Legacy, I reckon I could do an emergency stop in the 3 seconds just. It would require a split second decision as to whether to stop or continue, as just slowing down for a second would result in you passing through a redlight whether you then tried to stop or not.

In my Passat, there is no way I could stop in the 3 seconds. The brakes aren't as good, the tyres are narrower and have less grip and the car is heavier. I would have to slow down well before the traffic lights change if I were in that car.

So, what happens if I'm in the Legacy doing 70, and someone is tailgating me in a car similar to my Passat. Then the lights change when I'm 3 and a bit seconds away.

Do I:

a) do the emergency stop. I wont break any laws and as a bonus i'll get a new rear bumper, bootlid, exhaust and a few weeks off work.

b) continue at 70, potentially setting off a red light camera. Then have to take a day off work to explain my actions to some unpaid busybody

c) speed up to 90 to ensure that I pass through on amber, and hope there's no mobile cameras around.

Of course, if the road is clear, I could move into the other lane whilst doing my emergency stop, assuming I can keep control of the vehicle whilst doing so. But for the purposes of this exercise, assume that the other lane has traffic in it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 16:32 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Lum wrote:
So, what happens if I'm in the Legacy doing 70, and someone is tailgating me in a car similar to my Passat. Then the lights change when I'm 3 and a bit seconds away.

Do I:

a) do the emergency stop...
b) continue at 70...
c) speed up to 90...


d) think ahead more and reduce your speed before it becomes an emergency.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Aug 19, 2006 17:00 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
A traffic signal engineer tells me that the red-amber phase actually serves to increase capacity through junctions. If you didn't have it, that phase would need to be part of the red phase, and therefore the preparation time currently in the red-amber phase would be transferred to within the green phase. Unless drivers at the front were mega-alert, this could mean two cars less going through on each cycle.

In practice, while drivers often start moving during the red-amber phase, IME they rarely get very far beyond the stop line before the lights go green.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 33 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.027s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]