Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Sun May 10, 2026 00:12

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 21:51 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
http://www.thecourier.co.uk/output/2006 ... 9496t0.asp

Cameras catch out only 31 drivers

By James Rougvie

AVERAGE SPEED cameras installed on a stretch of the A90 between Dundee and Perth to police temporary restrictions are netting less than one speeding driver every two days.

Tayside Safety Camera Partnership yesterday revealed the controversial speed traps, monitoring the site of major road improvements between Glendoick and Kinfauns, have detected 31 offenders since going online on June 23.

The cameras, which calculate the speed of vehicles using number plate recognition software between two fixed camera points, are designed to snare vehicles which breach a 40mph limit.

TSCP officials said they are delighted so few motorists have broken the speed restriction on the busy route. One feature of the cameras’ presence over the summer has been the sub-40mph procession of traffic at peak times each day. That appears to have confounded an insistence by pressure group Safe Speed that when digital cameras were in place on motorway roadworks there has been a 4.5% increase in crashes.

Scotland’s road safety chief said the average speed system showed the system was not revenue-driven, and had been accepted by motorists.

Both the contractors, Balfour Beatty and Transport Scotland, reckoned a 40mph speed limit was vital to ensure the safety of construction workers and other road users during the 12-month contract, and it seems their faith in the cameras has been vindicated.

The average speed of the majority of vehicles travelling over the stretch was calculated to have been 39mph.

Louise Turner, who is communications officer for the camera partnership, said, “TSCP would like to take this opportunity to thank Tayside motorists for complying with the temporary speed limits.”

“It is encouraging to see such low numbers of offences being detected by the average speed cameras.”

She said that most drivers understood the need for reduced speed limits and accepted that enforcement was necessary to ensure the safety of the construction workers at the site.

Ideally, they She added they would have preferred to have detected no speeders, but she said a that small numbers of drivers continued to take risks, endangering not only their own lives but those of other road users and the workers.

“We will continue to work closely with Transport Scotland to deliver a road safety benefit to the A90, by enforcing the speed limit and by educating and encouraging motorists to adhere to speed limits on all roads throughout Tayside.”

A spokesman for Balfour Beattie welcomed the speed camera initiative, saying the safety of the travelling public and the welfare of its staff was its principal aim during the construction of interchanges.

Hugh McCafferty, Transport Scotland’s head of strategic road safety, welcomed the high level of compliance.

“The low numbers of penalties also highlights that systems of this type are not driven by money but by safety benefits,” he said.

“The travelling public are to be commended on their driving behaviour, and the results highlight public acceptance of the average speed management system.”

The temporary system will be in place until the works end in nine months.

==================

That's a bizarre piece of journalism. I shall write to them.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 22:38 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 02:50
Posts: 2868
Location: Dorset
No mention of how many numberplates the ANPR cameras failed to read...

_________________
Andrew.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 09, 2006 22:59 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
Ziltro wrote:
No mention of how many numberplates the ANPR cameras failed to read...


And no mention of the number of crashes. :roll:

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 00:03 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2004 13:36
Posts: 1339
And in unrelated news, the speed limit on the A90 is to be reduced to 30mph to improve safety.

:wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 09:33 
Offline
Member
Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 09:16
Posts: 3655
If the "income" is so low how are they going to afford to keep the system funded... :wink:

_________________
Speed camera policy Kills


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 09:42 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2004 15:05
Posts: 1225
Location: Glasgow
SafeSpeed wrote:
Ziltro wrote:
No mention of how many numberplates the ANPR cameras failed to read...


And no mention of the number of crashes. :roll:


It's a product of the programmed belief that slower speeds and high compliance must equal less crashes. Feeble minded thinking.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 10, 2006 10:16 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 06:46
Posts: 16903
Location: Safe Speed
r11co wrote:
SafeSpeed wrote:
Ziltro wrote:
No mention of how many numberplates the ANPR cameras failed to read...


And no mention of the number of crashes. :roll:


It's a product of the programmed belief that slower speeds and high compliance must equal less crashes. Feeble minded thinking.


Exactly.

_________________
Paul Smith
Our scrap speed cameras petition got over 28,000 sigs
The Safe Speed campaign demands a return to intelligent road safety


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.105s | 10 Queries | GZIP : Off ]