This letter appeared in the Lancashire Evening Post on Saturday, from Linda Sanderson (scammers mouthpiece)
"Cameras don't cause rise in casualties"
"Mr Brown is mistaken in his letter of March 1 condemning speed cameras. Road safety cameras do not cause an increase in road casualty figures. The evidence detailed in the 3rd and 4th year National Safety Camera Programme evaluation reports shows that cameras have reduced casulaties and speeds at the locations they have been placed.
In addition, the number of static cameras in Lancashire has remained the same for three years - certainly not a "proliferation". [b]By exceeding the speed limit by just 5 mph in a 30mph zone, a driver involved in an accident is twice a likely to kill someone than if they has kept within the speed limit. [b]Approximately two-thirds of crashes in which people are killed or injured happen on roads with a speed limit of 30 mph or less. These facts and many others are available on our website
www.safe2travel.co.uk"
What complete b*****. Strangely enough no mention of RTTM

Fixed scams might not have increased, but talivan use certainly has! I think 300 scams is quite enough already....
The bit in bold (my bold) is the best bit! Notice how the driver doing 35 is automatically blamed regardless of the circumstances.
Paul, you might want to set the record straight! The LEP are normally anti-scam!