*posted the wrong thread initially so here are my cun n pasted thoughts*
This to me just proves the main point about speed cameras being a way to raise revenue
I heard on the radio today that it will be law within the next year.
The governments argument for cameras has always gone like this "speed cameras are there to improve road safety and not to raise money, all cameras are in known accident blackspots...blah blah blah"
Ok given that these are thier claims then surely the idea of cameras would be to slow folk down and hence a speed camera that is doing its job properly should never issue a speeding ticket as folk would be slowing down for it.
Camera detection systems then, it can be argued, are simply an extra precaution. by having one in your car you get an in flight warning system telling you that you are entering a dangerous strech of road and therefore should be extra cautious.
Its just a bit unfortunate for the motorist that these warning systems also have the added side effect of helping them to avoid costly fines!!!
So putting all of that together what we have is a govenment that say in one hand, that they are trying to improve road safety by placing cameras everywhere they deem to be dangersous, yet in the other hand they are telling folk that its illegal for them to take extra precautions to warn them selves of these dangerous streches of road????
I think not! It strikes me that somebody realised that they will make far more money from the scameras if they make it illegal for people to have systems that warn you of thier presence!!!!
And still they would have us belive that they are a road safety measure rather than a revenue raising con trick...
