weepej wrote:
Johnnytheboy wrote:
The results do seem a little counterintuitive...
Not really, pavements are full of holes, lamp posts, postboxes and pedestrians, they are very narrow in places and uneven, and you've got to cross side roads by negotiating kerbs. Simply going slowly on a pushbike is enough to make many people fall off of their own accord, and falling off a pushbike will pretty much always result in some injury or other.
I imagine you are much more likely to come a cropper riding on the pavements than riding on the roads.
Which does beg the question as to why folk people do ride on the pavements

Mad Doc has his claws on some hospital stats from the A&E of the Trust he work in.
These show that plenty of accidents occur when cyclists ride on the pavements.. to the pedestrians....

who are the most vulnerable of all.
But then I note from a quick skim through that the poor pedestrian does not even get a mention of the injuries inflicted on them by these "cyclists".
Oh.. und by the way that wus I married to will be probably post up how one almost made me a widow in 2005. Mad Doc was walking (yes .. he does occasionally. He not allowed to drive Jag or Stag or Moggie Maniac (aka Morris 1000) on the pavement.

Anyway .. he walk. Past some trench for gas works. Pavement cyclist pushes past him und knocks him into this trench. He cut his leg - narrowly missed an artery.
I had to dance attendance on him.. Pooor deearrr! He could not even find the strength to stir the milk into his tea.
So .. will we say those who choose to ride on a pavement .. then bleat about how they should be regarded as normal traffic .. yet never attempt to blend in with the traffic are "bad "cyclists""
You bet we do.
