Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri Apr 24, 2026 11:13

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:24 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Ernest Marsh wrote:
Try that in Kendal's one way system - a simple journey requires lane changes galore, and takes you miles from where you used to be able to go!


They've done it in Holywell, north Wales, as well. It makes me sick. Those boneheads make roads that make you change lanes. Now I have to do a lot of barging about at roundabouts because they screwed up the lanes and put stupid arrows everywhere! Watsamatterwivem? Still, when I go nice and slow, things work out OK. In particular, go very slow at roundabouts. It's amazing how many spivs treat them as mini racetracks.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 11:52 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Abercrombie wrote:
Steve wrote:
A person who is incapable of changing lanes without being quite dangerous shouldn’t be allowed to drive.


That would certainly thin out the traffic! Many m-way accidents are caused by inappropriate lane changes. Again, I'm surprised a man like you doesn't know that. If you don't believe me, try it out for yourself - just take a ride along the m-way and check how stupid people are when they change lanes. On the other hand, just read the posts on THIS message board - quite a few of them relate to inappropriate lane changes, which more or less shows that changing lanes is complex and quite dangerous, compared to not changing lanes. I know you know I'm right, so why make a fuss, Steve?

I'm not making a fuss.
Yes some people make the occasional mistake when changing lanes; the great majority get it right.
The biggest concentration of danger is when drivers are changing lane, from a slip road to the main carriageway, because there are people who think they don't need to think or consider others at pinch points. Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised that people who don't think about it wouldn't know that.

I still say a person who is incapable of changing lanes without being quite dangerous shouldn’t be allowed to drive. Nor does it detract from the simple fact that it can be done safely


Abercrombie wrote:
Well, it's you against 19,900,000 google hits!

Were those from the UK only, or worldwide from areas where lanes can be designated as fast and slow.
How many of those hits were parts of phrases?
Were those from authoritive sites stating their official designation?
Why don't you type into your search box: "fast lane" site:gov.uk and see what you get. I did and found this:
"On the motorway, keep to the left hand lane unless you are overtaking - and remember that the right hand lane is not "the fast lane"."
Every properly educated driver knows they should keep left when not overtaking, regardless of their speed. It is usually those who are ignorant of this rule, who also believe the left lane is a 'slow lane', who inconsiderately hog Lane 2 so causing needless congestion.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:18 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Steve wrote:
some people make the occasional mistake when changing lanes;
It's good that you know you're not perfect.

Steve wrote:
The biggest concentration of danger is when drivers are changing lane, from a slip road to the main carriageway,


That's why imperfect people (like you) must go slower there.

Steve wrote:
I still say a person who is incapable of changing lanes without being quite dangerous shouldn’t be allowed to drive. Nor does it detract from the simple fact that it can be done safely


You say one thing up there (mistakes happen) and another thing here (mistakes don't happen). Please don't lie to me that we never change lanes without being dangerous. We know your not perfect. And be consistent within the same post, even if you can't manage it between different threads.

Steve wrote:
Why don't you type into your search box: "fast lane" site:gov.uk and see what you get.


Because gov.uk is well screwed up, Steve. The govt is not Britain - they are different things. You must be shitting me if you don't know what the slow lane is! Everybody else does...


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 12:33 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Steve wrote:
Every properly educated driver knows they should keep left when not overtaking, regardless of their speed.


All manner of lanes interfere that - deceleration lanes, loading lanes, merge lanes, tool booth lanes, carpool lanes, bus lanes, bicycle lanes, tram lanes, truck lanes, overtaking lanes, jammed up lanes, lanes with accidents, closed lanes, building work lanes, bus stop lanes ...
Steve wrote:
It is usually those who are ignorant of this rule, who also believe the left lane is a 'slow lane', who inconsiderately hog Lane 2 so causing needless congestion.


The rule makes no sense at all, man. Please, get real, will you? And take your little rule book and stick it somewhere safe. The lane to the left is called the slow lane - that's its F'ing name, for God's sake. Whatsamatterwithyerman? Go against the the OED if you like, but your on your own from here on in.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 13:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Johnnytheboy wrote:
it will wind up everyone nearby that has to get from Over Here to Over There on a schedule, and take a lot of the joy out of driving for a lot of others. Many people (obviously not car-hating know-it-alls) get a great deal of joy out of driving quickly and smoothly, and being held up by someone trying to drive as slowly as possible in the outside lane will not lower the stress levels of anyone who drives for
a living.


Hey, I'm not saying they should go poodling along in the fast lane ... you should drive fast over there. That's why it's called the fast lane. I'm just saying that you should stick in the slow lane until that's too slow for you, then go in the middle lane. If even that's too slow for you (God forbid) then go in the fast lane, but just for a bit. That's how people drive. But don't go changing lane too much - that's counter-productive. And don't get mixed in with all those heavy trucks in the slow lane - that's the worst thing you can do, unless (like me) you like to do a bit of slip streaming to get 70 mpg out of your crate! Basically, if you go into that old slow lane, get prepared to be stuck behind a behemoth for 15 minutes - good for gas, but you need a slow metabolism to stick it!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 13:38 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
if lane changing is so dangerous and the driving public in general are so inept at it.... how come motorways move at all ?

the number of lane changes that take place every day...... and the number that result in an incident must surely result in an absolutely minute %age


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 13:39 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Abercrombie wrote:
The rule makes no sense at all, man. Please, get real, will you? And take your little rule book and stick it somewhere safe. The lane to the left is called the slow lane - that's its F'ing name, for God's sake. Whatsamatterwithyerman? Go against the the OED if you like, but your on your own from here on in.


it's lane 1 mate :wink:


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 15:21 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
ed_m wrote:
it's lane 1 mate :wink:


Lane 1 is a live covers band playing music from the 50's 60's 70's 80's 90's and todays chart music rock and pop. The slow lane, however, is the traditional name for the strip of road where the truck are.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 15:25 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Abercrombie wrote:
ed_m wrote:
it's lane 1 mate :wink:


Lane 1 is a live covers band playing music from the 50's 60's 70's 80's 90's and todays chart music rock and pop. The slow lane, however, is the traditional name for the strip of road where the truck are.


whats the traditional name for the other 2 lanes ?
and what if there are 4 or 5 !


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 15:27 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
ed_m wrote:
if lane changing is so dangerous and the driving public in general are so inept at it.... how come motorways move at all ?


Because proper drivers know that the vast, majority of our time on the m-way should be spent not changing lanes. The oddballs here who claim to spend a big fragment of their driving time straddling two lanes are just taking the piss, basically.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 15:29 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
ed_m wrote:
whats the traditional name for the other 2 lanes ? and what if there are 4 or 5 !


The traditional names are the fast lane (immortalised by The Eagles), and the "middle lanes" for the others. There are other naming schemes, of course. But only one canonical one.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 16:02 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2005 21:10
Posts: 1693
Of course all this does make for an interesting philosophical question..

Which is the "Correct" terminology?

The definition contained within a government pamphlat (which, in most cases, is never opened again after the test is passed)

Or the common usage of almost all of the countrys 40 odd million drivers

:twisted:

_________________
"The road to a police state is paved with public safety legislation"


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 16:04 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 30, 2005 13:55
Posts: 2247
Location: middlish
Dusty wrote:
The definition contained within a government pamphlat (which, in most cases, is never opened again after the test is passed)


HC seems to use LEFT lane... and RIGHT lane in the motorways section !


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 16:07 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Abercrombie wrote:
All manner of lanes interfere that - deceleration lanes, loading lanes, merge lanes, tool booth lanes, carpool lanes, bus lanes, bicycle lanes, tram lanes, truck lanes, overtaking lanes, jammed up lanes, lanes with accidents, closed lanes, building work lanes, bus stop lanes ...

That's just immature. Yes let's move into a lane which is closed, has an accident, has trams.... :loco:

Abercrombie wrote:
The rule makes no sense at all, man. Please, get real, will you? And take your little rule book and stick it somewhere safe. The lane to the left is called the slow lane - that's its F'ing name, for God's sake. Whatsamatterwithyerman? Go against the the OED if you like, but your on your own from here on in.
[...]
Hey, I'm not saying they should go poodling along in the fast lane ... you should drive fast over there. That's why it's called the fast lane. I'm just saying that you should stick in the slow lane until that's too slow for you, then go in the middle lane. If even that's too slow for you (God forbid) then go in the fast lane, but just for a bit. That's how people drive.

That's how some people drive; others do it properly, safely and with consideration.
Rules 137 and 138 of the Highway Code would disagree with you - with good reason too.

People may well call them fast and slow lanes, but they're not; it just so happens that's the type of traffic that usually resides in them because of the nature of going relatively faster when overtaking within the overtaking lanes.

Motorways have the best safety record (for the net distance travelled on it) despite their highest speeds, yet this is the type of road where lane changing is most likely and quite frequent. Go figure.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 16:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Abercrombie,

You have a PM. Please check your message inbox.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 17:06 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Steve wrote:
People may well call them fast and slow lanes, but they're not;


They are called the fast lane and the slow lane, because people have noticed that the
slow lane is slow and the fast lane is fast.

Steve wrote:
Motorways .. is the type of road where lane changing is most likely and quite frequent.


OK, let's all change lanes more frequently to make the m-ways safer! Not!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 17:30 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Abercrombie wrote:
They are called the fast lane and the slow lane, because people have noticed that the
slow lane is slow and the fast lane is fast.

Yet the slow lane can also have 'fast' traffic....

Drivers should keep left as per the Highway code rules, that is why 'fast and slow lanes' are misconceptions otherwise the rules would be compatible with one remaining in lane for the duration – which clearly isn’t the case.

Abercrombie wrote:
OK, let's all change lanes more frequently to make the m-ways safer! Not!

That's obviously a silly statement. Such action need not create danger (which is my point); not creating additional danger doesn't equate to making it "safer".

If a manoeuvre can be done safely (which really can be the case by a competent and aware driver) then it follows that no additional risk was posed.

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 17:34 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Dusty wrote:
Of course all this does make for an interesting philosophical question..

Which is the "Correct" terminology?

The definition contained within a government pamphlat (which, in most cases, is never opened again after the test is passed)

Or the common usage of almost all of the countrys 40 odd million drivers

:twisted:


The Bard did all the work on this:
Shakespeare wrote:
Tis but thy name that is my enemy;
Thou art thyself, though not a Montague.
What's Montague? it is nor hand, nor foot,
Nor arm, nor face, nor any other part
Belonging to a man. O, be some other name!
What's in a name? that which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;
So Romeo would, were he not Romeo call'd,
Retain that dear perfection which he owes
Without that title. Romeo, doff thy name,
And for that name which is no part of thee
Take all myself.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 17:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 13:00
Posts: 919
Steve wrote:
the slow lane can also have 'fast' traffic....


Of course; it's just called "the slow lane".

Steve wrote:
'fast and slow lanes' are misconceptions otherwise the rules would be compatible with one remaining in lane for the duration – which clearly isn’t the case.


The name appears to be incompatible with the rules. Yet no power exists in the world to change the name - it is well and truly stuck. We will have to live with the world, as we find it.

Steve wrote:
not creating additional danger doesn't equate to making it "safer".


It's a good start.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 09, 2009 17:51 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:16
Posts: 7986
Location: Moved to London
Dusty wrote:
Of course all this does make for an interesting philosophical question..

Which is the "Correct" terminology?

The definition contained within a government pamphlat (which, in most cases, is never opened again after the test is passed)

Or the common usage of almost all of the countrys 40 odd million drivers

:twisted:

If appeal to popularity really is the accepted way, can we also apply it to speed limits, especially for DCs and motorways?
:D

_________________
Views expressed are personal opinions and are not necessarily shared by the Safe Speed campaign


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.016s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]