graball wrote:
Quote:
Umm . it has dips.. bends., Mways are better engineered

Yes but we are talking about a LIMIT of 70MPH (as they were when I (and probably you) learnt to drive)...it doesn't mean that you have to travel at 70MPH BUT as Weepy says if you are careful there is no reason why they shouldn't have a LIMIT of 70MPH, all country roads have wide open stretches that are safe at 70MPH in the right conditions at the right time of day.
Quote:
Cut me canine teeth on rurals as lad.

Learned how to handle "serious roads with a drop"from the Swiss "seniors to me" and my own Dad (plod trainer in his "saladn days"

) But you still have to COAST and if you COAST properly . you match safest speed/gear/position/gear etc to the conditions. and even lolly

Normally you are not drfiting too far above lolly . even on these roads. At night .. these are trickier than empty motorways all the same

I would be dishonest to all if I suggest otherwise

Our teams apply professional opinions . but to a fairly uniform and set standard of good practice. They apply this fairly to all .., but not one person gets away with "stupid" here

All get fair discretion . cough . all the same

to an agreed code of good practice which we know to be fair .. and which applied under Garvin's teams as does under Stoddart's teams

Buit we know lack of COAST .. driver error are the main causes ... inept appreciation of speed may be a factor .., but not necessarily the prime cause . but still linked to outcome all the same. We need to examine behaviour.. address training . instil good and well mannered habits/practice . That way.. we control the speed element a lot better perhaps.
I think we have to explore and drive down each avenue .. deal with each cul-de-sac .. to fully address real road safety policies for the future. Fora like this one allow us to examine such and we should do this politely .. OK ., tease and joke good naturedly oer the odd differences .. but still chat without acrimony all the same.