dcbwhaley wrote:
No good for:-
peeling an apple
sharpening a pencil
whittling a stick
opening recalcitrant packaging
cutting up food
gutting a fish
And just how many of the people who carry knives around in public actually do these activities? At home/work yes, but on a night out? Come on!
dcbwhaley wrote:
Carrying a knife is as harmless as exceeding the speeding in the correct circumstances. I have being doing both for over forty years without hurting anyone
Ah, I did wonder why you were so defensive over this. Now I don't doubt you use it responsibly and have no intent of harming anyone, but you have to accept there are people who carry knives solely for reasons less than admirable (none of the reasons you gave).
This is the important part of this sub debate:
dcbwhaley wrote:
jomukuk wrote:
I think the average deaths from knife wounds is about 30/year.
Criminal injuries caused by knives are much higher. In my town about two stabbing per week[end].
And how many people injured by cars every weekend?
How many people drive cars, and how many people carry knives? We already know half the population drives, does half the population carry knives?
This knife debate is meaningless and devoid of perspective without knowledge of the comparative exposures.
Need I bring up my water/cyanide example once again?
FACTS:322 fatal stabbings recorded by police last year
RCGB2007: fatal accidents (including police chases) where exceeding speed limit was a contributory factor = 342
Ooh, that's comparable! And that's merely one factor in several (as opposed to being the sole cause)
YouGov/Admiral survey: 82% of drivers admitted to sometimes or frequently exceeding the limit
crimeandjustice.org.uk wrote:
The 2005 OCJS found that 4 per cent of young people aged 10 to 25 had carried a knife in the last 12 months
What do you think that will be for those who carry "sometimes or frequently" (as opposed to 'at least once in 12 months'):
82%, or significantly less than 4% ?
What do you think that will be for the population in general (not just the young):
82%, or significantly less than 'significantly less than' 4% ?
Like I said: perspective is needed.