Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 17:15

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 22:17 
Offline
Suspended
Suspended

Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 14:31
Posts: 97
mikes1988 wrote:
This is kinda off topic, but...

One afternoon I came up behind this car, and I could have sworn there was a camera on the back window... Seriously... It was moving (turning around) and stuff... Was it a police car, or just some random person with a camera looking at me...

I wasn't doing anything wrong, just curious as to what this camera was doing on the back window...

Any ideas guys?


It must have been me!
Quote:

I think having cameras in cars would be a silly idea, if you have cameras on your car, surely it's going to make it easier to prosecute yourself if you do something wrong?


Yes, a lot of you have a lot to worry about...
I don't think I'm going to go out and break the law in my car. I haven't done it yet, and I won't do it in the future.
Why would I want to "prosecute myself" anyway?
Quote:

I'm pretty certain noone drives totally legally 100% of the time, and what if when something happens, they start to look through your last month or whatever video footage, how many offences are they going to find and approach you about...


This is getting laughable.
Firstly, they wouldn't find any offences done by ME, but your presumption that every speeds all the time, or breaks the road laws in other ways, is very telling...
Secondly, why would I keep months of footage? If nothing happens on a journey, I tape over it all. If something happens, I copy it to my PC.

This IS going to start happening - many people are just like me- peeved off with the number of idiots who shouldn't be driving on our roads, fed up with having our lives threatened every day by maniacs who think they own the road.

The police will HAVE to act when the videos are plastered all over the internet, clearly showing the plates and faces of these drivers.

Can anybody translate the German guy's post, about faking footage, as I gave up trying.

Nobody can fake footage, if so, show me some. Show me faked footage of a car driving somewhere, that's realistic, and high resolution.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Mar 12, 2006 23:22 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Feb 16, 2005 18:54
Posts: 4036
Location: Cumbria
Mosis, would you have the (true) road speed displayed in the corner of the frame of your "accidentally" shot video - like police cars do? It strikes me that this information would be pretty fundamental to any successful prosecution.

Also, you might have to connect your brake lights to it as well. Thinking about it, someone in the video very rapidly approaching the back of your car, getting too close and wearing a frustrated expression could either be a homicidal tailgater who was speeding and then seeking to intimidate you OR some perfectly innocent driver driving within the speed limit who just had some moron brake hard in front of them for no apparent reason!

I guess it all depends when you start and stop the tape!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 00:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Apr 18, 2004 21:39
Posts: 140
Location: St Annes
Didn't one of the newpapers catch Brunstums daughter speeding. They were using a borrowed speed gun. But it never got to court as the gun wasn't calibrated / or the operator wasn't qualified or something.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 01:35 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 23:09
Posts: 6737
Location: Stockport, Cheshire
I drive maybe 15,000 miles a year, and in the past have done a lot more.

I see a fair amount of behaviour that is maybe a bit daft or thoughtless.

I virtually never see anything that on the basis of a video record would be considered worthy of prosecution as careless or dangerous driving.

_________________
"Show me someone who says that they have never exceeded a speed limit, and I'll show you a liar, or a menace." (Austin Williams - Director, Transport Research Group)

Any views expressed in this post are personal opinions and may not represent the views of Safe Speed


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 01:53 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
PeterE wrote:
I drive maybe 15,000 miles a year, and in the past have done a lot more.

I see a fair amount of behaviour that is maybe a bit daft or thoughtless.

I virtually never see anything that on the basis of a video record would be considered worthy of prosecution as careless or dangerous driving.


Exactly - and we all have different perceptions of what we consider to be daft of thoughtless as well.

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 02:40 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
mosis wrote:

Quote:

I think having cameras in cars would be a silly idea, if you have cameras on your car, surely it's going to make it easier to prosecute yourself if you do something wrong?


Yes, a lot of you have a lot to worry about...
I don't think I'm going to go out and break the law in my car. I haven't done it yet, and I won't do it in the future.
Why would I want to "prosecute myself" anyway?


As my wife and IG pointed out already - you are complacent. You do not know if you may indavertently do something wrong - and if you are so buys pointing the finger at others - and everyone else is filming - you may in be for a nasty suprise if flimed at moment your bulb blows or you straggle a double white/solid white to overtake a milk float at 8 mph. A civilian video is not going to show the speed at being 8 mph - just that you overtook on a double white and you are legal to overtake up to 10 mph - if safe to do so :wink:

Also do you not htink it hypocritical to wag finger at everyone else when you may also be above speed limit ? I doubt if your film would get the number of the tailgater - too close to get the reg anyway ... :wink:

Oh - how do I know? Because we do have some cams which we use on occasion to teach hazard perception and good practice to the twins who will be 17 in the summer. Like Ern - we use some film of real driving to teach our young or learn something for ourselves by "replay" We would never dream of running off to Ian or IG over it though ... :roll: But then - people have been daft - but not downright dangerous - but then our driving styles try to diffuse the dangers anyway ... :wink:

We drive to COAST - and you still have not defined how this fits your drives - nor shown you understand POWER either. Wildy has given a clue in this thread by the way :wink:

Quote:
Quote:

I'm pretty certain noone drives totally legally 100% of the time, and what if when something happens, they start to look through your last month or whatever video footage, how many offences are they going to find and approach you about...


This is getting laughable.
Firstly, they wouldn't find any offences done by ME,


aGAIN COMPLACENCY.

You cannot be sure - as said - if I were to film you legally overtaking a vehicle below 10 mph on a double white - it would bot be clear unless I could prove a calibrated speed showing this was legal.

Your brake light main switch may fail - this would render you illegal - and if you have not topped your secreen wash or cleaned your windows or even have a hairline crack - you'd not be legal - but no film would show this.

Also - you say you glance at your speedo every 10 seconds - if you are so "brilliant" - you should not need to.


In my experience all the truly awful drivers think they are superb, never ever breaking the law ....never can be taught anything new ... and they are the ones who never think how thier driving affects the other road user, do not give enough space to cyclists (you won''t see them - too busy speedo gawping and you must have a reason for 10 second glances - cannot believe you are so unaware of speed that you have to check so constantly ... :roll: )

Do us all a favour - pipe down - do an IAM course and then tell us what they found lacking. :wink:

You would be less than truthful if you returned and said your Observer thought you were the bees knees - they note things you never considered prior to this :wink:


Quote:
. but your presumption that every speeds all the time, or breaks the road laws in other ways, is very telling...[/qutoe]


People do not always know if a bulb blows en route - but they are illegal. We check on all stops anyway - we carry spares.


Plus - road cambers, surfaces - plus a human foot not being robotic .. already explained to you - and you will be above speed limit at some point for very short spell on any one journey.

If new to an area - or town has new and confusing one-way - again very easy to inavertently break a law or if they decided int ther wisdom not to allow a right or left turn - and you customarilly used these turns - you may continue to do so "on auto" because you always did.

Thus lots of ways you could break a law - and since you are complacent and show me no signs of COASTability - reckon you may find you get caught out by someone else filming you filming them :wink:

Quote:
Secondly, why would I keep months of footage? If nothing happens on a journey, I tape over it all. If something happens, I copy it to my PC.


Quite frankly - better things to store on my PC than something which annoyed me on my way to work - and I may perceive it to be illegal - but a professional may not. :wink:

Besides - you then have loads of time then to airbrush and enhance to suppost your complaint.

We do edit our family films - would not do to send the grandparents films of the kids being a little too high spirited - with the rogues rolling around or squabbling over who has the red Porsche in Scalextric. :wink: :lol: :lol:
Quote:
This IS going to start happening - many people are just like me- peeved off with the number of idiots who shouldn't be driving on our roads, fed up with having our lives threatened every day by maniacs who think they own the road.


But its your judgement and not a professional's. We see the daft - but a good driver has anticipated and diffused the danger to some degree - and if someone wants to cut in front of me - I just let them.. Not worth getting steamed up about. If - on the rare occasion - I find someone is too close to me - I adjust to give them space to overtake me.

Two wrongs have never made a right - and in any case if I filmed and complained - and the complaint was justified - I'd still have all the bother of court and affidavits which would be time and paperwork and inconvenience to me. But then - COAST etc enables me to observe, anticipate and plan - and by doing so - I diffuse the immediate danger.

That's how I opine you are not driving to COAST and too complacent to learn.

Quote:
The police will HAVE to act when the videos are plastered all over the internet, clearly showing the plates and faces of these drivers.

Can anybody translate the German guy's post, about faking footage, as I gave up trying.

Nobody can fake footage, if so, show me some. Show me faked footage of a car driving somewhere, that's realistic, and high resolution.


I could - but then am not likely to place photos of the kids on the internet - when we do send - they are burned to disc and sent snail mail.

But do buy "Digital Photography" - they show you how to edit, enhance, air brush and give special effects and the software to use.

by the way - my wife has a problem with silly words such as "und" for "and" and "ist" for "is"

Used to be worse .. we were subjected to "mit" for "with" "und so weiter.." and some naughty German words at one point. :lol: :lol:

Have AND

AND
IS

in magnetic letters all over the fridge and posters in her study... makes no difference ... :roll:

Lingo in the home? English of a sort to me... :shock: High German to the kids and Schywz/romansch/French/Italian amongst the family - but usually Schwyzer :roll: - Appenzeller version :lol: which is nasal. :lol:

A right pain to be married to.... :lol: at times :lol:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 08:23 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
mosis wrote:
Nobody can fake footage, if so, show me some. Show me faked footage of a car driving somewhere, that's realistic, and high resolution.



As MM has said - ist very possible to airbrush und give special effects to...
Und also if on editing - you delete a frame or split ever so slightly - ist extremely possible to give an incorrect impression of what actually happen.

Mad Doc wrote:
But do buy "Digital Photography" - they show you how to edit, enhance, air brush and give special effects and the software to use.


Und there are books in the computer shops as well ;)

Mad Doc wrote:
by the way - my wife has a problem with silly words such as "und" for "and" and "ist" for "is"

Used to be worse .. we were subjected to "mit" for "with" "und so weiter.." and some naughty German words at one point.

Have AND

AND
IS

in magnetic letters all over the fridge and posters in her study... makes no difference ...


Ach - so that's what they are for..... :lol:

Mad Doc wrote:
Lingo in the home? English of a sort to me... High German to the kids and Schywz/romansch/French/Italian amongst the family - but usually Schwyzer - Appenzeller version which is nasal


:hehe: It ist to check you are listening to me ....mein Lieber... :twisted: .

Wait until he get home tonight! wrote:
A right pain to be married to.... at times


:shock: :shock: :shock: :shock: :wink:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 14:59 
Offline
Life Member
Life Member
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 21:17
Posts: 3734
Location: Dorset/Somerset border
Hang on, I think I've missed the point here :?

Why would anyone who wasn't sanctimonious, suffering from a God complex and with a lot of free time actually want to do this?

As Mosis is presumably not talking about speeding offences (because private video footage would not be able to show this), wouldn't having more traffic police (like we used to) driving about doing this for us be a better idea?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 15:34 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
Wildy -As Mosis is presumably not talking about speeding offences (because private video footage would not be able to show this), wouldn't having more traffic police (like we used to) driving about doing this for us be a better idea?


Brilliant idea - wonder why our highly intelligent government hadn't thought of this ( ooh forgot - needs cash )

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 16:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 15:14
Posts: 420
Location: Aberdeenshire
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Hang on, I think I've missed the point here :?

Why would anyone who wasn't sanctimonious, suffering from a God complex and with a lot of free time actually want to do this?

As Mosis is presumably not talking about speeding offences (because private video footage would not be able to show this), wouldn't having more traffic police (like we used to) driving about doing this for us be a better idea?


Oh, I'm sure Mosis is talking about speeding offenses. He sticks absolutely glued to his speedometer. It's accuracy or lack thereof is simply is dodging the point.

Perhaps upon analysis of all these incidents of bad driving and tailgating, Mosis will realise that the common factor in each of them is him.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 16:52 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
Jamie_duff--Perhaps upon analysis of all these incidents of bad driving and tailgating, Mosis will realise that the common factor in each of them is him.


:clap: :clap: :clap:

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Mar 13, 2006 21:41 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 23:28
Posts: 1940
Johnnytheboy wrote:
Hang on, I think I've missed the point here :?

Why would anyone who wasn't sanctimonious, suffering from a God complex and with a lot of free time actually want to do this?


Exactly ;)

But did meet twazak from hell - or rather three of them. The dodygy unwise overtake on NSL with poor visibility und surface :yikes:

Two chaps on wrong side of road - overtaking. ... Was 30 mph urban - I was on-coming und had to feather brake und adjust position und still give adequate clearance to cyclist at time.. :roll:

Person they overtake .. at 28 mph in my opinion too. No need for it. :roll:

Irritating ... illegal .. but still not of mind to bother reporting to lieber Ian as all normal drivers apply COAST und thus adapted to hazard of numpty. Diffused und we all used greatest normal skills :wink:

Have thought about whether could have done better und come to conclusion - not much could do - but may be shaved off a further 3 mph for the cyclist. He was at 20- mph .. I shaved to 17 m,mph per the origin on board. THihnk I gave him just 1.5 sec distance initially - dropping to two und should have been two from start .. ... :oops:

I am sure twazak will have behaved purrfektly at the fixed scam location though :roll:


but still not inclined to report und in any case - would not have speed und would have had to "freeze frame" for reg ... und thus civilian footage open to accusation und suspicion :wink:

Quote:
As Mosis is presumably not talking about speeding offences (because private video footage would not be able to show this), wouldn't having more traffic police (like we used to) driving about doing this for us be a better idea?


Genau Liebchen :love:

Exactly... these are the professionals who can judge a lot better und be objective about it.

I do respect Ian, IG und all the :bib: on PH ... I value each one of them - und I owe my life to one who ist on the BBC prog from Cheshire - the one with the longer service :roll: :oops: :wink: :wink:

Ja - eldest kitten now 18 und bit... I started being broody young... :wink: :wink: und have nice successful career because my lovely Papa ensured a "precocious" education :lol: But I cannot pretend to see 40 again ... :yikes: - but then am lucky to see 40 ... 8-) - ist achievement :lol: - but still owed 100% to a policeman who was an absolutely gentle und clever man one day.


Und I want these types around .. 24/7 und I do notr begrudge one penny of my tax if it pay for what we all need.

I do begrudge paying for those who0 could not be employed otherwise und bureaucratic oafs who seek to destroy British justice in bid to seek out their pee-cee mealy mouthed objectives of pure jealous nonsense - who hate those who can - because they can do und achieve all that they are incapable of doing :wink:

_________________
Nicht ganz im Lot!
Ich setze mich immer wieder in die Nesseln! Der Mad Doc ist mein Mann! Und ich benutzte seinen PC!

UND OUR SMILEYS? Smile ... und the the world smiles with you.
Smiley guy seen when you read
Fine me for Safe Speed
(& other good causes..)

Greatest love & Greatest Achievements Require Greatest Risk
But if you lose the driving plan - don't lose the COAST lesson.
Me?
Je ne regrette rien
!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 08:49 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 23:42
Posts: 3820
:roll: :roll: :oops:

Forgot to mention... and surprised the Mad Cats never mentioned as they had to do this as well...

But - if you are as "observant as you claim to be" mosis - you would surely note that all the shops using CCTV, all the towns and even the s/cam partnerships abide by one law in the land..

They are required to have a sign warning you that cameras are operating - an as Sir Ian B discovered - even if you are - (to coin an apt Wildy word :roll: _ - the "toppest" and most senior :bib: in the land - you cannot record some things "in secret - without their knowledge -

Like the Mad Cats - have cams around my property in case someone tries to burgle me. We all were required to place a sign warning people that we have cameras in operation on the property.

You would have to have such a sticker on your car... :wink:

Just thought you need to be made aware of the legal requirements since you do not seem to have much knowledge about this either :wink:


PS - police cars by virtue of the workd "POLICE" written all over them - there will be doo-dahs fitted...

PPS - unmakred cars? Well - the officer's in uniform ... clearly in uniform - and there one or two other tell tale signs - but :evil: :twisted: not for this forum .... :lol: - so those COAST skills? :lol: :twisted: - do work .... :wink:

_________________
Take with a chuckle or a grain of salt
Drive without COAST and it's all your own fault!

A SMILE is a curve that sets everything straight (P Diller).

A Smiley Per post
FINES USfor our COAST!


Approach love and cooking with reckless abandon - but driving with a smile and a COAST calm mind.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 09:26 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Sun Sep 26, 2004 01:59
Posts: 280
On the theme of stickers on my car, I'm tempted to put radioactive cargo / toxic waste ones on it to deter the occassional tailgater, is that legal if there is no radioactive cargo?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 20:48 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2004 21:41
Posts: 3608
Location: North West
Ah.. IG ... yep - had to get some permission for the right to film baddies if I were to report them. As for the odd stuff I film to teach the twins at mo' - for own use and no intent to do anything else with the short films.. and therein lies the legal difference.

If you intend to use this stuff to report a crime or perceived crime - you have to warn so that person may think twice and not do something daft. If for a "tourist" film or just used in way we use any filmed stuff to educate, never broadcast or seek to harm another - then we are OK as I understand from Andreas and his pals... :wink:

_________________
If you want to get to heaven - you have to raise a little hell!

Smilies are contagious
They are just like the flu
We use our smilies on YOU today
Now Good Causes are smiling too!

KEEP SMILING
It makes folk wonder just what you REALLY got up to last night!

Smily to penny.. penny to pound
safespeed prospers-smiles all round! !

But the real message? SMILE.. GO ON ! DO IT! and the world will smile with you!
Enjoy life! You only have the one bite at it.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 20:53 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
Quote:
IG - PPS - unmakred cars? Well - the officer's in uniform ... clearly in uniform - and there one or two other tell tale signs - but not for this forum .... - so those COAST skills? - do work ....


Yes -IG - but now police are using unmarked -SKODAs ---not really cricket is it :lol: ( after all would you be seen in a Skoda)

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 14:20 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
Who are all these 'mr angrys' aggressively tail gating? I can't remember an occasion when he's bothered me.....maybe its because I tend to pull in and let people pass?

Mosis, why? do you really want to become some sort of misguided vigilante or did you just say that camera nonsense so that someone would say'thats a bad idea' so you could then counter with the 'if you've got nothing to fear.....' nonsense.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 17:21 
Offline
Former Police Officer
Former Police Officer
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 00:27
Posts: 351
At the start of this thread Mosis makes a prediction, I'd like to make one too.

In the event that you go down this route Mosis, I predict that one day you will film someone who doesn't want you too and whilst they retreive your camera and film they will probably wind up seriously hurting you. If todays holigans think nothing of shooting a police officer then they will not give a second thought to your existance.

It is best to leave policing to those that are both trained and paid to do the job, as indeed it is best for them to extract themselves from the policies that they are required to enforce.

Policy is for politicians and democracy, democracy is about discussion as indeed is this website. I for one was quite pleased when you joined, yostarted out as a reasoned poster, putting your point of view resoanbly articulately, however like so many of your colleagues you have resorted to insultss as you fail to find the flaw in the argument against cameras.

Now I shall repeat, we are not all speed crazed freaks here, yes there are one or two but they don't stay long either, we are however all concerned with the decreasing standards of driving and road safety that has accompanied the loss of the traffic police from our roads, a loss that can be directly attributed to the speed camera policy.

_________________
Former Military Police Officer and accident investigator


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 18:55 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Fri Apr 22, 2005 10:30
Posts: 2053
Location: South Wales (Roving all UK)
I'm getting quite concerned and confused.

Just who exactly are these 'speed crazed freaks', 'mr angrys' and so on that everyone keeps encountering?

I consider myself to be a pretty responsible driver who follows lane discipline, takes care around town and in bad conditions, lets people out of junctions and into queues (unless they're p1$$ takers) although I do tend to drive on the higher side of 70.

Does that make me one? (by some definitions I may be because I drive a german car)

What does a speed crazed freak look like? what do they drive? how old are they? what sex are they? how do they behave?

If nobody can answer this then I suggest we forget such hyperbole and get on debating the issues at hand. There are two scales by which a driver can be judged...competancy and recklessness.

The best score high on the former and low on the latter.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Mar 17, 2006 23:49 
Offline
User
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 00:15
Posts: 5232
Location: Windermere
Well spoken and polite engineer wrote:
What does a speed crazed freak look like? what do they drive? how old are they? what sex are they? how do they behave?

If you spent more time looking in your rear view mirror, and less time on looking where you are going, you would know!
They are all held up behind you while you potter along AT the posted speed! :lol:

_________________
Time to take responsibility for our actions.. and don't be afraid of speaking out!


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 45 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.022s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]