mosis wrote:
Quote:
I think having cameras in cars would be a silly idea, if you have cameras on your car, surely it's going to make it easier to prosecute yourself if you do something wrong?
Yes, a lot of you have a lot to worry about...
I don't think I'm going to go out and break the law in my car. I haven't done it yet, and I won't do it in the future.
Why would I want to "prosecute myself" anyway?
As my wife and IG pointed out already - you are complacent. You do not know if you may indavertently do something wrong - and if you are so buys pointing the finger at others - and everyone else is filming - you may in be for a nasty suprise if flimed at moment your bulb blows or you straggle a double white/solid white to overtake a milk float at 8 mph. A civilian video is not going to show the speed at being 8 mph - just that you overtook on a double white and you are legal to overtake up to 10 mph - if safe to do so
Also do you not htink it hypocritical to wag finger at everyone else when you may also be above speed limit ? I doubt if your film would get the number of the tailgater - too close to get the reg anyway ...
Oh - how do I know? Because we do have some cams which we use on occasion to teach hazard perception and good practice to the twins who will be 17 in the summer. Like Ern - we use some film of real driving to teach our young or learn something for ourselves by "replay" We would never dream of running off to Ian or IG over it though ...

But then - people have been daft - but not downright dangerous - but then our driving styles try to diffuse the dangers anyway ...
We drive to COAST - and you still have not defined how this fits your drives - nor shown you understand POWER either. Wildy has given a clue in this thread by the way
Quote:
Quote:
I'm pretty certain noone drives totally legally 100% of the time, and what if when something happens, they start to look through your last month or whatever video footage, how many offences are they going to find and approach you about...
This is getting laughable.
Firstly, they wouldn't find any offences done by ME,
aGAIN COMPLACENCY.
You cannot be sure - as said - if I were to film you legally overtaking a vehicle below 10 mph on a double white - it would bot be clear unless I could prove a calibrated speed showing this was legal.
Your brake light main switch may fail - this would render you illegal - and if you have not topped your secreen wash or cleaned your windows or even have a hairline crack - you'd not be legal - but no film would show this.
Also - you say you glance at your speedo every 10 seconds - if you are so "brilliant" - you should not need to.
In my experience all the truly awful drivers think they are superb, never ever breaking the law ....never can be taught anything new ... and they are the ones who never think how thier driving affects the other road user, do not give enough space to cyclists (you won''t see them - too busy speedo gawping and you must have a reason for 10 second glances - cannot believe you are so unaware of speed that you have to check so constantly ...

)
Do us all a favour - pipe down - do an IAM course and then tell us what they found lacking.
You would be less than truthful if you returned and said your Observer thought you were the bees knees - they note things you never considered prior to this
Quote:
. but your presumption that every speeds all the time, or breaks the road laws in other ways, is very telling...[/qutoe]
People do not always know if a bulb blows en route - but they are illegal. We check on all stops anyway - we carry spares.
Plus - road cambers, surfaces - plus a human foot not being robotic .. already explained to you - and you will be above speed limit at some point for very short spell on any one journey.
If new to an area - or town has new and confusing one-way - again very easy to inavertently break a law or if they decided int ther wisdom not to allow a right or left turn - and you customarilly used these turns - you may continue to do so "on auto" because you always did.
Thus lots of ways you could break a law - and since you are complacent and show me no signs of COASTability - reckon you may find you get caught out by someone else filming you filming them
Quote:
Secondly, why would I keep months of footage? If nothing happens on a journey, I tape over it all. If something happens, I copy it to my PC.
Quite frankly - better things to store on my PC than something which annoyed me on my way to work - and I may perceive it to be illegal - but a professional may not.
Besides - you then have loads of time then to airbrush and enhance to suppost your complaint.
We do edit our family films - would not do to send the grandparents films of the kids being a little too high spirited - with the rogues rolling around or squabbling over who has the red Porsche in Scalextric.
Quote:
This IS going to start happening - many people are just like me- peeved off with the number of idiots who shouldn't be driving on our roads, fed up with having our lives threatened every day by maniacs who think they own the road.
But its your judgement and not a professional's. We see the daft - but a good driver has anticipated and diffused the danger to some degree - and if someone wants to cut in front of me - I just let them.. Not worth getting steamed up about. If - on the rare occasion - I find someone is too close to me - I adjust to give them space to overtake me.
Two wrongs have never made a right - and in any case if I filmed and complained - and the complaint was justified - I'd still have all the bother of court and affidavits which would be time and paperwork and inconvenience to me. But then - COAST etc enables me to observe, anticipate and plan - and by doing so - I diffuse the immediate danger.
That's how I opine you are not driving to COAST and too complacent to learn.
Quote:
The police will HAVE to act when the videos are plastered all over the internet, clearly showing the plates and faces of these drivers.
Can anybody translate the German guy's post, about faking footage, as I gave up trying.
Nobody can fake footage, if so, show me some. Show me faked footage of a car driving somewhere, that's realistic, and high resolution.
I could - but then am not likely to place photos of the kids on the internet - when we do send - they are burned to disc and sent snail mail.
But do buy "Digital Photography" - they show you how to edit, enhance, air brush and give special effects and the software to use.
by the way - my wife has a problem with silly words such as "und" for "and" and "ist" for "is"
Used to be worse .. we were subjected to "mit" for "with" "und so weiter.." and some naughty German words at one point.
Have
AND
AND
IS
in magnetic letters all over the fridge and posters in her study... makes no difference ...
Lingo in the home? English of a sort to me...

High German to the kids and Schywz/romansch/French/Italian amongst the family - but usually Schwyzer

- Appenzeller version

which is nasal.
A right pain to be married to....

at times
