Safe Speed Forums

The campaign for genuine road safety
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 14:27

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 12:08 
Offline
User

Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2004 22:34
Posts: 603
Location: West Scotland
From Yahoo link: Temporary speed camera nets £1M

http://uk.news.yahoo.com/18042006/344/t ... ts-1m.html

A Gatso speed camera installed temporarily at roadworks raised more than £1 million in fines, it has emerged.

The camera on the M62 at Ferrybridge, West Yorkshire, caught 18,000 drivers speeding in an 18-month period.

It was installed in September 2003, when the speed limit was reduced from 70mph to 50mph while work was done on the motorway.

According to figures obtained by The Sun under Freedom of Information, motorists caught by the Gatso were charged £1,088,000 in fines.

Installation of the devices on a number of other motorways, including the M6 in Cheshire, the M4 and M5 near Bristol and the M11 in Essex, brought in hundreds of thousands of pounds at each site.

Temporary speed cameras have netted £7 million in fines over the past two years, the figures showed.

A camera on the M20 at Ashford in Kent caught 656 drivers in six days, generating charges of £39,390.

According to the Sun, all Gatsos across the country are set to raise a total of £130 million for the Treasury this year.

My comments:

And in addition to that we have a casualty reduction of......0

Bloody cash grabbing vultures!

regards

Andrew

_________________
It's a scam........or possibly a scamola


Homer Simpson


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 17:28 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 21:00
Posts: 73
Location: Plymouth
well :?: what would you expect of a greedy system :?: that punishes good safe driving, and lets off all local joy riders just in case one of them gets wiped out :!:

_________________
Brian of Plymouth
When will the government realise , that to err is only human, to be perfect is to be GOD.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Apr 18, 2006 20:09 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
And to ensure maximum chaos ( and presumably profit) the widening of the M1 is now policed by PC SPEC, which presumably is on 24/7 although the road works (and the risk ) are not.

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 14:43 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 14:04
Posts: 216
Location: Manchester
First post on here, but been reading for a while now......

I went through this scamera at approx 55mph a few months ago. As I remember the bollard marked lanes swerved away from the camera on approach. Hence I didn't spot it till I was going through it as I was doing the really stupid thing of paying attention to the road in front of and around me :o Miraculously it didn't flash though, presumably because they were changing the film for the tenth time that day :roll:

I also recall when these roadworks were removed they left the 50mph limit in place for some time and there was no NSL sign indicating the end of the 50 limit.

_________________
Why can't we just use Common Sense?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 15:44 
Offline
User

Joined: Tue Mar 09, 2004 12:33
Posts: 770
Location: Earith, Cambs
When the roadworks are finally removed the speed limit has no validity, even if the signs are still in place.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 16:48 
Offline
User

Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 21:00
Posts: 73
Location: Plymouth
Cooperman wrote:
When the roadworks are finally removed the speed limit has no validity, even if the signs are still in place.


Yes , but how many actually know this gem of information?
very very few,

_________________
Brian of Plymouth
When will the government realise , that to err is only human, to be perfect is to be GOD.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 17:18 
Offline
Friend of Safe Speed
Friend of Safe Speed
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 19:50
Posts: 3369
Location: Lost in the Wilderness
Cooperman wrote:
When the roadworks are finally removed the speed limit has no validity, even if the signs are still in place.


What constitutes removal of roadworks? I very often see cones at the side of the road but no actual work being carried out and the carriageway is clear of any obstructions, and the reduced limit signs and cameras still in place. Or signs saying barrier incomplete but can't see where it's not complete. I've seen it said that as long as there are no obstructions in the carriage way they can't use the barrier incomplete as an excuse to leave the speed limits in place, is this correct? :)

_________________
Useless laws weaken necessary laws.


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Apr 19, 2006 17:27 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 19, 2006 14:04
Posts: 216
Location: Manchester
Dixie wrote:
Cooperman wrote:
When the roadworks are finally removed the speed limit has no validity, even if the signs are still in place.


What constitutes removal of roadworks? I very often see cones at the side of the road but no actual work being carried out and the carriageway is clear of any obstructions, and the reduced limit signs and cameras still in place. Or signs saying barrier incomplete but can't see where it's not complete. I've seen it said that as long as there are no obstructions in the carriage way they can't use the barrier incomplete as an excuse to leave the speed limits in place, is this correct? :)


That's what it was like in this instance. Just a few cones along the central reservation. Perhaps, when no-one is actually working on the roadworks the temp speed limits should be deemed invalid.

_________________
Why can't we just use Common Sense?


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 06:07 
Offline
Member
Member

Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 01:42
Posts: 686
So what defines "roadworks". The workers, the cones or obstructions in the main carriageway? If it is "obstructions", how is this defined?

_________________
“For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.” - H. L. Mencken


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 14:33 
Offline
Gold Member
Gold Member

Joined: Fri Sep 24, 2004 23:26
Posts: 9268
Location: Treacletown ( just north of M6 J3),A MILE OR TWO PAST BEDROCK
MONEY - no nonononononononononoonoonononoononononon - it's not about money , it's all about road safety ( hmm, whats that) and if we can make a buck or two , is that bad ?.After all ,all we're doing is helping the Government keep costs down ( very sarcastic :lol: )

_________________
lets bring sanity back to speed limits.
Drivers are like donkeys -they respond best to a carrot, not a stick .Road safety experts are like Asses - best kept covered up ,or sat on


Top
 Profile Send private message  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 44 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You can post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
[ Time : 0.049s | 11 Queries | GZIP : Off ]