SafeSpeed wrote:
We just need to enforce appropriate speed.
Yes, we definitely need to do that within the absolute limit. And then we
have to enforce the absolute limit as well, because else it is not a limit,
but a guideline. There is no 'third way', is there? Are you in favours of
scrapping limits and introducing general guidelines instead?
SafeSpeed wrote:
If they don't know what 'appropriate' is and they offend we have done good.
Yes, people within the absolute limit who otherwise offend should be
prosecuted, as they are now, or more so.
But please elaborate on your ideas about those outside the limit. Who
would decide if they had offended or not? How would drivers know if they
are offending in that respect? If you are wrongly "said" to be offending by
driving outside the “limit”, what would your appeal process be and who
would hear what evidence? How would people be able to effect changes in
the behaviour of drivers passing through their locales? How could the
public complain about offenders when no tangible or measurable criteria
are in existence? Would drivers who are outside the guidelines and crash
be entitled to sue the road authorities for not making the limits clear?
Would drivers who are crashed into by those outside the limit be entitled
to compo because the government had replaced absolute limits by
guidelines? How could corruption and favouritism be avoided? Could we
be sure that the ad hoc system you propose is fair, in any sense? Would it
be consistent, in any sense? Would it be systematic, measurable or
achievable? How could performance be measured? What metrics could be
gathered from the ad hoc process for improvement at accidents sites and
for deciding resource allocations? What action could be taken at frequent
accident sites to effect improvement, other than posting a permanent
copper there? What would be the criteria that you would ask drivers,
policemen, judges and solicitors to use? How much over the guidelines is
acceptable in what circumstances, exactly? How would the driving norms
be communicated? What would it say in the highway code? What would we
teach new drivers? Is it right to replace limits with guidelines? Would it be
politely acceptable when it comes out that the limits have been replaced
by guidelines?
Sorry for the repetition in any of those questions, but these are some
things that have not yet been explained fully.