Gizmo wrote:
johnsher wrote:
oh yes, total chaos as you were 'held up' for all of a tenth of a second getting past. Unlike the gridlock you faced at the next junction you came to which didn't hold you up at all.
I think you have missed the point. But then that doesn’t surprise me.
I'll try again shall I
Two lanes FULL of free flowing traffic at 50mph. Line of trucks nose to tail on the left hand lane. Line of trucks brake to avoid running into cyclist and have to swerve into L2. Dual carriage way now down to a single lane traffic now flowing at 25 MPH. Cyclist lucky to still be alive.
6 foot wide cycle lane next to the road empty.
Now do you get it.....

Ahh, Gizmo - you should simply take to the empty cycle lane, and make good progress as long as it is wide enough! It's not like you would be inconveniencing anyone - it only takes an oncoming cyclist all of a tenth of a second getting past you by swerving around - perhaps less if the grass is short!
After all, many motorists have to find a parking space one they get to their location.
I use the cycle lane on the way to work when I cycle, which is swept regularly where I travel, but I DO take to the road before I reach the point where I have to cross from one side to the other, as often there is no safe gap in the traffic for a minute or three, so if a convenient opening occurs, I cross over one or two hundred yards before, and make my way as quickly as possible to the ramp where I rejoin the cycle path. As far as I can tell, the only riders who do not use the path at all, are off comers, who dont even trouble to find out if the path is good or not.
The road is twisty for much of it's length, hilly, and busy, and anyone riding in the road puts themselves at risk. I take care to minimise the risk, but accept that there is one!